Recommandations
L'entrée est le cours de clôture de l'actif à la date de publication. Le cours actuel est la dernière clôture enregistrée.
-
Entrée $217,55 28 août 2026Actuel $217,55 28 août 2026Résultat +$0,00
CARRY ON, KEEP BUYING NVIDIA.
Contexte EMILY: SO THAT'S WHAT'S GOING TO CARRY US THEN UNTIL WE GET MAYBE A LITTLE MORE CLARITY FROM THE FED. CARRY ON, KEEP BUYING NVIDIA. BECAUSE SOME OF THESE CHIPS ARE SELLING OFF.
Transcription Complète
[MUSIC] >> THE COUNTDOWN IS ON.
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO GET THE EDGE AT THE END OF THE MARKET
DATA. THIS IS "THE CLOSE." ROMAINE:
THE ANGST OVER FED CREDIBILITY SUBSIDES FOR NOW.
LIVE FROM STUDIO 2 AT BLOOMBERG HEADQUARTERS I'M ROMAINE
BOSTICK. EMILY: AND I'M EMILY GRAFFEO.
LET'S GET A LOOK AT HOW MARKETS ARE TRADING ON THIS JACKSON
HOLE DAY AFTER CHAIRMAN KEVIN WARSH VOWED TO KEEP INFLATION
AT THAT 2% TARGET OR AT LEAST TRYING TO GET THERE.
WE HAVE EQUITY MARKETS REACTING NOT TO MUCH, BUT WE DO HAVE S&P
500 IN THE READ ABOUT 0.3%. WHAT IS REALLY GETTING HIT ARE
THE SMALL CAPS. THE RUSSELL 2000.
THE SENSITIVE PART OF THE INTEREST -- EQUITY MARKET
REALLY DRAGGING HERE. THE FOCUS REALLY ON YIELDS.
THE YIELD CURVE FLATTENING. THE 30'S YIELD CURVE NARROWING
BY ABOUT 10 BASIS POINTS AS TRADERS AMP UP BETS FOR FED
RATE HIKES AND THEY ARE MAYBE NOT AS CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT IS
GOING ON IN THE LONGER END. FINALLY THE DOLLAR ALSO MOVING
UP. ROMAINE:
PRIOR TO TODAY THERE WAS A CHORUS OF INVESTORS TO FIGHT
INFLATION AND IT FEELS LIKE HE GOT THE GEOFFREY RUSH, COLIN
FIRTH TREATMENT AND DID FIND A WAY TO STOP STAMMERING AND GIVE
THE MARKETS WHAT THEY WANT. THAT WAS AN UNWAVERING
COMMITMENT TO CURB PRICE GROWTH AND A FULL THROATED ENDORSEMENT
OF INTEREST RATES AS THE FED'S PREDOMINANT TOOL. CHAIR WARSH:
WE SHOULD NOT INDULGE A REGIME IN WHICH MARKET PARTICIPANTS
ARE LOOKING PRIMARILY TO THE FED FOR THEIR NEXT TRADE.
THE FED IS THE DECISION-MAKING AGENCY. WE MAKE CHOICES AMID
UNCERTAINTY. THE DATA UPON WHICH WE DRAW
MUST BE RELEVANT, CONTEMPORANEOUS, ACCURATE, AND
AS ACTIONABLE AS POSSIBLE. THE FED'S PRICE STABILITY
OBJECTIVE OF 2% AS MEASURED BY THE PCE PRICE INDEX IS A FIRM,
FIXED TARGET, ACHIEVING BOTH SIDES OF OUR MANDATE OVER THE
MEDIUM TERM IS NOT AN EITHER OR PROPOSITION.
WE MUST BE CONFIDENT THAT UNDERLYING INFLATION IS MOVING
TO OUR OBJECTIVE CLEARLY AND A SUFFICIENT SPEED.
OTHERWISE, WE HAVE WORK TO DO. THAT IS OUR JOB, THAT IS OUR
MANDATE, AND THAT IS OUR CHARGE TO KEEP. ROMAINE:
JUST ABOUT A MINUTE OF A 30 MINUTE SPEECH, WIDE-RANGING
SPEECH PARSED FOR EVERY SINGLE WORD AND THE PUBLISHED
STATEMENT PARSED FOR EVERY SINGLE PUNCTUATION, LIKE
ELLIPSES. NO EXPLANATION AS TO WHY HE IS
SO CONCERNED ABOUT 65 STRAIGHT MONTHS OF A BUG TARGET
INFLATION BUT DID NOT PUSH FOR A HIKE AT THE LAST FOMC MEETING
IN JULY. POLICYMAKERS AT JACKSON HOLE
NOW RETREAT BEHIND CLOSED DOORS FOR THE REST OF THE MEETING AND
THE MARKET WILL MAKE UP WHAT IT WILL.
DOLLAR HIGHER, BITCOIN LOWER. GOLD FACING ITS BIGGEST DROP OF
THE MONTH AND THEN THERE IS THE FLATTENING YIELD CURVE.
SHORT-TERM RATES OUTPACING LONG-TERM RATES BY 17 BASIS
POINTS TODAY. THE WIDEST DIVERGENCE SINCE
FEBRUARY 2025. LET'S KICK THINGS OFF TO THE
CLOSE ON THIS FRIDAY AFTERNOON, JACKSON HOLE DAY WITH THE
PRESIDENT OF THE MILL U.S. I DO WANT TO START NOT WITH
WHAT HE SAID, BUT WITH THE IDEA OF LAYING OUT A ROADMAP FOR
INVESTORS WITHOUT NECESSARILY TIPPING HIS HAND.
ONE OF THE FIRST WORDS OUT OF HIS MOUTH WAS THIS AIN'T
FORWARD GUIDANCE THOUGH I'M SURE WE WILL ALL TAKE IT AS
SUCH. DOES IT GIVE YOU A CLEARER
PICTURE ABOUT HOW THE FED WILL OPERATE GOING FORWARD? >> THANKS AND THANKS FOR HAVING
ME ON AGAIN. CERTAINTY IS ALWAYS BETTER.
HE IS WORKING TOWARD GIVING THE MARKET MORE CERTAINTY.
FOR US IT IS CRITICAL. UNDER A VARIETY OF SCENARIOS,
HOW DO THEY THINK ABOUT EACH AND EVERY SCENARIO AND HOW ARE
THEY PREPARED TO ANNOY SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM BASIS
SO IT IS NOT SO MUCH WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN A
SIGNIFICANCE SCENARIO, IT IS PREPARING FOR A VARIETY OF
SCENARIOS. ROMAINE: LET'S TALK ABOUT YOUR CLIENTS
BECAUSE YOU SERVE THE ECONOMY WITH REGARD TO THE BUSINESSES
AND CONSUMERS THAT COME TO YOU. PRIOR TO TODAY, HEADING INTO
THE SECOND HALF OF THE YEAR, HAVE YOU SEEN ANY MATERIAL
CHANGE IN THE WAY THEY ARE DEPLOYING, DELAYING, SPENDING,
ANYTHING LIKE THAT? ARON: THE GOOD NEWS IS THERE IS
GENERAL OPTIMISM. THAT LEVEL OF UNCERTAINTY HAS
BEEN THERE NOW FOR A WHILE. MAYBE 12 OR 18 MONTHS SO OUR
CLIENTS HAVE STARTED TO LEARN WITHIN THAT UNCERTAINTY AND NOT
PREVENT THEM FROM MOVING FORWARD. WE DO WANT TO GROW.
WE WANT TO WORK TOWARD OUR OBJECTIVES, LOOKING FOR
CAPITAL, LOOKING FOR ADVICE. I WOULD SAY ALL THINGS CONSIDER
THE ECONOMY IS SHOWING STRENGTH AND CLIENTS ARE SHOWING
OPTIMISM. EMILY:
CAN THE OPTIMISM CONTINUE WITH RATES MOVE HIGHER FROM HERE.
ARON: ANYTIME RATES CHANGE IT AFFECTS
A LOT OF THINGS. WHAT WE ARE HEARING AND SEEING
ACROSS INDUSTRIES IS A LOT OF PREPARATION AND A LOT OF FOCUS
ON EFFICIENCY AND CLIENTS THINKING THROUGH WHAT HAPPENS
IF RATES GO UP, HOW DO I REACT TO THAT? THE MORE TIME THINKING THROUGH
THOSE SCENARIOS, THEY WILL HAVE A PLAN TO MOVE FORWARD AND THAT
IS WHAT WE ARE HEARING AND SEEING. EMILY: WHAT WAS YOUR BROADER REACTION
LISTENING TO KEVIN WARSH WHO SAID THEY DON'T WANT TO
COMMUNICATE AS MUCH BUT TO HIS DEFENSE IT WAS LIKE A 30 MINUTE
SPEECH. WERE YOU ABLE TO READ THE TEA
LEAVES? DOES IT FEEL LIKE THIS IS A FED
THAT IS COMMUNICATING LESS? ARON:
I'M DEFINITELY NOT THE RIGHT PERSON TO READ TEA LEAVES ON
THE FED. WHAT I'M FOCUSED ON AND WHAT MY
TEAM IS FOCUSED ON WORKING WITH CLIENTS IS THINKING THROUGH
WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF DIFFERENT SCENARIOS?
HOW DO WE MAKE SURE THEY ARE PREPARED AS THEY LOOK AT THEIR
LIQUIDITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, HOW DID THEY THINK ABOUT
LONG-TERM STRATEGIC THINKING AND THAT IS HOW WE ADD VALUE
AND THAT IS WHY OUR CLIENTS COUNT ON US.
WE HAD A REALLY TERRIFIC THIRD-QUARTER PERFORMANCE AND I
THINK THAT REFLECTS THE ADVICE AND GUIDANCE WE ARE GIVING.
ROMAINE: INTEREST INCOME WAS UP 4%.
COMMERCIAL LOANS UP 4%. IF WE ARE HEADED TOWARD A RATE
ENVIRONMENT WHERE RATES ARE HIGHER IN THAT FIGHT TO
INFLATION, DOES NOT BECOME A MARGIN BENEFIT OR ARE YOU MORE
CONCERNED ABOUT THE HIT TO CREDIT DEMAND? ARON:
OUR MARGINS ARE UP 20 BASIS POINTS YEAR-OVER-YEAR. OUR CLIENTS ARE LOOKING TO GROW?
ROMAINE: AS WE TALK ABOUT THE VARIOUS
SECTORS OF THIS ECONOMY, WE THINK ABOUT SMALL BUSINESS,
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS, REAL ESTATE, HOUSING, I KNOW IT IS
ALL DIFFERENT INDUSTRIES. IS THERE SOME SIMILAR THREAD
YOU ARE SAYING THAT BINDS THEM ALL TO THE SAME FUTURE FOR LACK
OF A BETTER PHRASE? ARON: I THINK ONE THREAD IS THE FOCUS
ON EFFICIENCY WHETHER LEVERAGING AI OR LOOKING AT
PROCESS AND EXPENSE AND ALL OF OUR CLIENTS ARE REALLY THINKING
THROUGH THAT AND A DISCIPLINED WAY, BUT WE ARE SEEING GROWTH
ACROSS A LOT OF DIFFERENT SECTORS.
WE SAW GROWTH IN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, FINANCE,
ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION, AND EVEN INTO THE EMERGING MARKET. WE ARE SEEING GOOD, CONSISTENT
GROWTH WHERE WE ARE SEEING THESE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS BUT
WE ARE THINKING THROUGH HOW DO WE GROW AND MAKE SURE WE ARE
SUCCESSFUL REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME? EMILY:
HOW MUCH OF THAT GROWTH IS COMING FROM AI?
WHETHER IN CREDIT MARKETS, EQUITY MARKETS, VERSUS MAY BE
LOOKING TO DIVERSIFY AND OFFER CLIENTS SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF
THE AI TRADE? ARON: OBVIOUSLY BROADLY FOR THE
ECONOMY THERE IS A LOT OF GROWTH TIED TO AI BUT FOR US THE FOCUS IN THE MIDWEST HAS
BEEN ACROSS A LOT OF INDUSTRIES THAT ARE NOT NECESSARILY
DIRECTLY TIED TO AI. AS WE HAVE GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
WITH THE ACQUISITION WE MADE, WE SEE THE RELATED SECTORS.
BROADLY, WE SEE GROWTH FROM BEYOND THE AI PLAY. ROMAINE:
I DON'T WANT TO KEEP HARPING ON EVERY SINGLE WORD THAT KEVIN
WARSH SAID, BUT THERE WAS ALSO A LOT OF TALK IN HIS SPEECH
ABOUT THIS IDEA OF MONEY MATTERING. HIS WORDS, NOT MINE. IT SEEMED TO BE GETTING AT THIS
IDEA OF THE VELOCITY OF MONEY BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, FOCUSING
MONEY INTO THE SYSTEM, WHICH IS YOU AND YOUR PEERS WHEN IT
COMES TO THE MONEY THAT IS CREATED OUT OF THESE BANKS.
IF WE HAVE STRONGER COMMERCIAL LOAN GROWTH NOW, DO YOU SORT OF
LOOK AT AND INFLATION FIGHT AS BEING A FUNCTION OF THAT,
COMPLEMENTARY TO THAT, OR WORKING AGAINST THAT? ARON:
I THINK THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT THE BANKING INDUSTRY, WE ARE IN A VERY GOOD POSITION SO WE HAVE
THE CAPABILITY AND CAPACITY TO DELIVER THE CAPITAL ALL THE WAY
UP TO THE LARGEST CORPORATE CLIENTS.
BANKS IN GENERAL AND CERTAINLY A BANK LIKE BMO HAS MORE THAN
ENOUGH CAPITAL TO PROVIDE AND FUND FUTURE GROWTH. ROMAINE:
AS WE SORT OF I GUESS HEAD INTO THE WILD BLUE YONDER HAS, WE
ARE TALKING ABOUT THE ECONOMY AT LEAST ON PAPER THAT SEEMS TO
BE HOLDING UP. INFLATION HIGH, NOW A FED CHAIR
WHO SEEMS TO BE CLEAR HE IS WILLING TO COMMIT TO THAT.
EMILY MENTIONED THE AI BOOM, A BIG DRIVER OF OUR ECONOMY.
AS YOU LOOK FOR NEW OPPORTUNITIES HEADING INTO NEXT
YEAR, DOES THAT BECOME A REPEAT OF THE PLAYBOOK FOR 2026 OR ARE
YOU NOW LOOKING TO SOMETHING DIFFERENT? ARON: FOR US, WE ARE FOCUSED ON
WORKING WITH CLIENTS ACROSS A RANGE OF OPPORTUNITIES.
WE DELIVER ON LOANS AND BANKING BUT ALSO HELPING THEM WITH
LIQUIDITY AND CASH MANAGEMENT. VERY EXCITED ABOUT THE TREASURY
BUSINESS THAT GREW YEAR-OVER-YEAR. CERTAINLY CAPITAL MARKETS, THE
M&A BUSINESS HAS SOME OF THE LARGEST PIPELINES WE HAVE EVER
SEEN SO I THINK HOW WE ADD VALUE FOR OUR CLIENTS IS
DELIVERING ACROSS A RANGE OF THINGS AND THAT CAN THEN EXTEND
TO WEALTH MANAGEMENT AND CERTAINLY ON THE CONSUMER SIDE
MAKING SURE WE ARE THERE AND WORKING WITH CLIENTS AT EVERY
LEVEL SO THEY GET WHAT THEY NEED FROM CORE BANKING SO THERE
IS A HUGE OPPORTUNITY FOR US NOT ONLY IN THE MIDWEST BUT
ALSO IN THE WEST COAST TO GROW ACROSS A RANGE OF SOLUTIONS AND
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE FOCUSED ON. ROMAINE:
ARON LEVINE, PRESIDENT OF BMO U.S., KICKING US OFF TO THE
CLOSE HERE. WE WILL GET MORE OF A DIRECT
REACTION FROM AN INVESTOR IN EQUITY AND BOND MARKETS AND WE
WILL GO BACK OUT TO JACKSON HOLE BECAUSE OUR COVERAGE HAS
NOW CONCLUDED. WE WILL HAVE A SIT DOWN LATER
TODAY WITH THE IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA,
ATTENDING HER FIRST JACKSON HOLE ECONOMIC SYMPOSIUM.
WE WILL ALSO GET HER REACTION TO THE SPEECH A LITTLE BIT
EARLIER. STICK WITH US. THIS IS BLOOMBERG. ♪ ROMAINE:
WELCOME BACK TO "THE CLOSE," LIVE FROM OUR STUDIOS IN NEW
YORK CITY BUT ALL THE ACTION RIGHT NOW IS HAPPENING OUT IN
JACKSON HOLE, WYOMING. THAT’S WHERE LISA HAS BEEN
STACKED OUT ALL DAY LONG. SHE HAD A SIDELINE VIEW TO THAT
KEYNOTE SPEECH BY KEVIN WARSH EARLIER TODAY AND YOU ACTUALLY
HERD ONE PREVIOUS TO THAT AND THAT WAS BETHHAMMOCK.
SHE SAID WE HAVE TO START FIGHTING INFLATION.
WHEN IS THAT GOING TO START? IN TWO WEEKS AT THE SEPTEMBER
MEETING? >> RIGHT NOW A LOT OF PEOPLE
THINK THAT KEVIN WARSH HASN’T LOCKED HIMSELF IN FOR A RATE
HIKE BUT CLEARLY LOCKED THAT IN IN A WAY IT WASN’T PREVIOUSLY.
65 MONTHS OF ABOVE-TARGET INFLATION WHEN HE IS LOOKING AT
CORE C.P. EFFORT FROM HOW THE COMPONENTS
UNDERNEATH P.C.E. WERE BROAD BASED, GIVES THE
SENSE THAT THERE IS A LACK OF PATIENCE AND THAT HE IS READY
TO DELIVER ALONG WITH A LOT OF THE COMMITTEE.
BETH HAS BEEN HAWKISH FOR A WHILE. THE CLEVELAND DISTRICT IS
ASKING THAT SHE DO SOMETHING ABOUT INFLATION.
IT’S BECOMING AN INCREASING PROBLEM.
IT SEEMS LIKE PEOPLE ARE SAYING IT’S NOT ENOUGH TO HAVE AN
EXCUSE OF WHERE THE INFLATION IS COMING FROM.
THE ABSOLUTE PRICE LEVEL HAS GOTTEN INCREDIBLY CONCERNING.
KEVIN WARSH CAME OUT A LOT MORE HAWKISH THAN SOME WERE
EXPECTING. HE DID DIFFER SOMETHING.
HE DELIVERED A SENSE THAT HE WAS CONCERNED AND THAT HE IS
PREPARED TO TAKE ACTION AND THAT IS THE TONE HEADING INTO
THE WEEKEND AND HAS CLEARLY PLAYED OUT THROUGH MARKETS.
EMILY: WHAT WAS THE REACTION OF PEOPLE
YOU TALKED TO IN JACKSON HOLE? WHAT WERE PEOPLE SAYING ABOUT
WARSH’S SPEECH? LISA: KATE MOORE SAID MARKETS ARE IN
STRIDE. IT’S NOT GOING TO BLINK OR
SERIOUSLY SELL OFF IN RESPONSE TO HIGHER INTEREST RATES.
IF ANYTHING MARKETS ARE HIGHER IN GENERAL AND RATES ARE HIGHER
FOR THE SAME REASON, WHICH IS GROWTH IS STRONG AND EARNINGS
IS ROBUST. IT’S NOT JUST NVIDIA. A LOT OF PEOPLE SAYING YOU CAN
SEE THE PRODUCTIVITY IN MARGIN EXPANSION AND THE REST OF THE
493 THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FORGOTTEN THIS YEAR WITHIN THE
S&P 500 AND RUSSELL,000. EVEN THOUGH TODAY YOU’RE SEEING
THIS KNEE-JERK LET’S SELL, YOU HAVEN’T SEEN THAT OVER THE PAST
COUPLE OF YEARS WHEN RUSSELL 2000 HAS ALREADY BAKED IN
HIGHER INTEREST RATES. OVERALL PEOPLE ARE TAKING THIS
IN STRIDE SAYING THIS IS A MARKET THAT CAN HANDLE IT.
THE REAL QUESTION IS THIS A GOVERNMENT THAT BE HANDLE THAT?
AT SOME POINT DOES IT BECOME SOMETHING THAT GOVERNMENT HAS
TO DEAL WITH? WHERE YOU HAVE INFLATION
RUNNING TOO HOT FOR TOO LONG AND LOOKING TO STEP IN.
RILEY WE’LL CHECK BACK IN THIS ABOUT AN HOUR’S TIME.
BACK HERE IN NEW YORK WHEN WE COME BACK WE’LL ASSESS SOME OF
THE RISKS THAT INVESTORS ARE NOW HAVING TO CONFRONT.
WE’LL CATCH UP WITH ANDREW SLIMM OH, N.
THAT’S NEXT HERE ON BLOOMBERG. ROMAINE:
SURPRISINGLY WE LEARNED A LOT TODAY OUT OF THE FED CLAIRE
KEVIN WARSH. ONE INTERESTING COMMENT WAS THE
SO-CALLED HALL OF MIRRORS PROBLEM AS HE TALKED ABOUT
WHERE THE FED RELIES ON MARKET PRICES AND SAYING WE’RE ALL
MORE LIKELY TO BE BLINDED TO NEW DROPS.
IT’S AN INTERESTING TURN AND FRANKLY ALLOWS THE MARKET TO
GET A BETTER SENSE OF HOW WARSH THINKS AND HOW THIS FED WILL BE
GUIDED. ANDREW SLIMMON JOINS US. I’M SURE YOU WERE WONDERING
ABOUT THAT SPEECH. DO YOU WALK AWAY FROM TODAY
HERE ON THIS AUGUST 28 FEELING MORE CONFIDENT ABOUT AT LEAST
HAVING THE IDEA OF WHERE THE FED MIGHT GO NEXT? ANDREW:
YEAH, I THINK HE REITERATED AND WENT INTO MORE DETAIL OF WHAT
HE LAID OUT EARLIER WHICH IS THE FED IS NOT GOING TO BE AS
COMMUNICATIVE, HALL OF MIRRORS, AS HE SAID, THEY’RE NOT GOING
TO LEAD THE MARKET AND HE’S BEEN VERY CONSISTENT.
I THINK IT’S VERY HEALTHY. I’M HAPPY WITH WHAT HE SAID BUT
I’M NOT SHOCKED AT ANYTHING HE SAID.
I THINK IT’S VERY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE HEARD BEFORE, JUST
MORE DETAIL. ROMAINE: NOW THAT YOU HAVE THAT DETAIL,
HOW TO YOU ADJUST, IF AT ALL, ANY OF YOUR INVESTMENT
STRATEGIES OR ALLOCATIONS PRESUMING, AS MOST SEEM TO BE
DOING RIGHT NOW, THAT THE NEXT MOVE IN RATES IS HIGHER? ANDREW:
EVEN IF THEY DON’T RAISE RATES, THREAT THAT THEY COULD RAISE
RATES IS CAUSING A CHANGE IN THE LEADERSHIP IN THE MARKET
TODAY. NOW THE SUPERMARKET IS SLAT OR
DOWN A LITTLE BIT BUT IF WE LOOK UNDER THE HOOD, YOU SEE
THAT REAL SPECULATIVE STOCKS ARE NOT DOING WELL. WHY?
THEY WORK IF YOU KNOW THE FED IS GOING TO CUT RATES.
THEY DID VERY WELL AFTER LAST YEAR’S JACKSON HOLE EVENT WHEN
JEROME POWELL SAID WE’RE CUTTING RATES.
THEY DON’T DO VERY WELL IN A RATE-RAISING ENVIRONMENT.
THEY ARE SELLING OFF. MONEY IS MOVING INTO THE MORE
STABLE LARGER CAP TECH STOCKS. FINANCIALS, GREAT FOR
FINANCIALS. HE’S SAYING RATES WILL STAY
HIGH SO I THINK THERE IS LEADERSHIP CHANGE AND THEN I
GUESS THE OTHER THING THAT I WOULD HAVE TO SAY IS THAT
YOU’RE HOPING FOR SO -- THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
HE’S ALSO SAYING THE ECONOMY IS VERY STRONG AND I THINK
EARNINGS DRIVE THIS STOCK MARKET TO HIGHER LEVELS BY YEAR
END BUT DON’T EXPECT ANY -- EXPANSION. >> SO SPECULATIVE STOCKS NOT
WORKING. SMALL CAPS NOT WORKING. THIS IS JUST THEN REITERATING
THE PLAY THAT’S BEEN DRIVING THE MARKET FOR SO LONG, AS YOU
SAID, RIGHT? LARGE CAP, MEGA CAP, TECH
STOCKS, THAT’S WHERE YOU WANT TO CONCENTRATE A PORTFOLIO
GOING FORWARD? ANDREW: YEAH, BUT NOT REALLY FROM LAST
SUMMER UNTIL CHAIR NBA WARSH TOOK OVER.
WHAT WORKED WAS THE BIG STOCKS, THE MAG 7 LAGGED.
AND I THINK IF I SPOON-FEED YOU THAT I’M GOING TO CUT RATES, RATES ARE DROPPING THEN THE
INEVITABLE CONCLUSION IS GO AHEAD AND TAKE RISKS.
AS AN ACTIVE MANAGER WHO TRIES TO CONTROL THE AMOUNT OF RISK
WE TAKE, THAT’S COMING BACK INTO VOGUE, I DON’T THINK IT’S
NECESSARY IF THEY LAY OUT A PATH WHICH THEY DID BEFORE OF
LOWER RATES. ROMAINE: I DO WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE
OTHER BIG EVENT THAT CIRCLED THIS WEEK AND THAT WAS NVIDIA
AND THE BROADER CONVERSATION AROUND AI TRADE.
IF YOU BELIEVE WHAT WE SAW FROM NVIDIA THAT’S STILL INTACT, THE
SPENDING IS STILL THERE AND JENSEN HUANG EXPECTS THAT
SPENDING TO AT LEAST BE STRONG, AT LEAST THROUGH 2028.
DO YOU LOOK AT THE VALUATIONS ON SOME OF THESE STOCKS, THE
HYPERSCALERS, THE PICKS AND SHOVELS COMPANIES AND SAY THIS
IS STILL A BUY THROUGH 2028. ANDREW:
THEY TRADE AT VERY REASONABLE VALUATIONS SO THE MARKET IS
SAYING WE DON’T BELIEVE IN THE DURATION OF THIS TRADE THE WAY
THAT THESE COMPANIES ARE ARTICULATING TO US.
THAT IS THE DECISION THAT AS AN INVESTOR YOU HAVE TO MAKE.
IS THE DURATION -- WHY ARE THE MEMORY STOCKS UP SINGLE DIGITS?
THE MARKET IS TELLING YOU THIS COULD BE -- I DON’T THINK SO.
I THINK THIS IS GOING TO LAST LONGER BUT THAT’S THE KEY
DECISION THAT YOU HAVE TO MAKE AND SO WHEN YOUR EARNINGS
REPORTS WHERE C.E.O.’S LIKE YESTERDAY COME OUT AND SAY WE
SEE VERY GOOD VISIBILITY FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS, I
THINK THAT STRENGTHENS THAT ISSUE.
I DO THINK, THOUGH, THAT THIS ELECTION COMING UP THIS ALL IN
IS GOING TO WEIGH ON THE DATA CENTER BUILD OUT BECAUSE IT’S
GOING TO BRING INTO QUESTION THE RATE AT WHICH THAT’S GOING
TO STALL OUT. RILEY THANK YOU, ANDREW.
SENIOR PORTFOLIO MANAGER AT MORGAN STANLEY INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT. WHEN WE COME BACK, A BROADER
DISCUSSION ABOUT AI IN THE CLASSROOM. >> I THINK THE MOST IMPORTANT
THING IN EDUCATION IS THE PRODUCTIVE STRUGGLE AND IF YOU
OFFLOAD THAT TO AN AIA, IT IS NOT A GREAT LEARNING EXPERIENCE
SO I'M SEEING EDUCATORS NEED TO BE EDUCATED IN HOW TO USE AI
AND THEN THE APPROPRIATENESS PER ASSIGNMENT.
IN THIS CASE YOU CAN USE IT FOR IDEATION, AND THIS CASE YOU CAN
USE IT TO CORRECT YOUR WORK, WE NEED TO TEACH TEACHERS AND
STUDENTS WHEN THERE IS PRODUCTIVE STRUGGLE AND WHEN
THERE IS NOT. ROMAINE:
AI'S INFLUENCE ON EDUCATION. OUR NEXT GUEST IS PROMOTING AI
READY CAMPUSES, AI IN THE CLASSROOM AND PLEDGING TO TRAIN
MORE THAN ONE MILLION PEOPLE OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS.
JOINING US IS THE PRESIDENT OF CISCO AND THEIR CHIEF PRODUCT
OFFICER. GREAT TO HAVE YOU HERE OWN OF
THE PROGRAM. LET'S START OFF WITH EXACTLY
WHAT AI ACTUALLY MEANS, MEANING AI IN THE CLASSROOM, WHAT YOU
SAY THAT ACTUALLY MEANS. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THAT, WHAT
IS THE ARGUMENT FOR MAKING THIS A BIGGER COMPONENT OF LEARNING? >> YES, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT
IF YOU TAKE A STEP BACK AND SAY, WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH AI
RIGHT NOW? THE BIG SHIFT THAT IS GOING TO
HAPPEN IN SOCIETY OVER TIME IS THAT FOR THE PAST FEW HUNDRED
YEARS WE HAVE ALL BEEN OPTIMIZED FOR HOW MUCH
KNOWLEDGE DO WE HAVE? KNOWLEDGE IS GOING TO GET TO BE
A COMMODITY AND IT IS NOT GOING TO DIFFERENTIATE PEOPLE ABOUT
THE KNOWLEDGE IN YOUR HEAD. THE QUALITY OF QUESTIONS YOU
CAN ASK TO GET ANY INSIGHT BACK SO IT IS A FUNDAMENTAL
STRUCTURAL SHIFT IN THE MENTAL MODEL YOU HAVE TO APPROACH
EDUCATION WITH WHICH IS TRULY UNDERSTAND THE QUALITY OF
QUESTIONS THAT CAN BE ASKED SO YOU CAN GET EXACTLY WHAT YOU
WANT BACK TO HAVE ORIGINAL INSIGHTS THAT CAN DO THINGS YOU
COULDN'T DO BEFORE. ROMAINE: I'M CURIOUS ABOUT THAT
STATEMENT, THAT ALMOST SEEMS TO BE MAKING A STATEMENT FOR MORE
OF A HUMAN ELEMENT IN OUR CLASSROOMS. BASICALLY YOU JUST
DESCRIBED THE HUMANITIES. JEETU: I DON'T THINK AI AND THE HUMAN
ELEMENT ARE MUTUALLY OPPOSED, I THINK YOU NEED BOTH.
BUT THAT TELLS YOU EVEN MORE YOU NEED TO HAVE AI IN THE
CLASSROOM SO THAT PEOPLE CAN ACTUALLY START TO THINK IN VERY
DIFFERENT WAYS THAN THE WAY THEY HAVE BEEN CONDITIONED TO
THINK OVER THE COURSE OF THE PAST SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS.
ROMAINE: ON THAT POINT AND I UNDERSTAND
WHAT YOU ARE SAYING BUT THE IDEA THAT THE KNOWLEDGE ITSELF
BECOMES COMMODITIZED, BUT ISN'T THE KNOWLEDGE ITSELF THE
FOUNDATION OF THAT HUMAN CRITICAL THINKING,
INTERPRETATION ITSELF? YOU CAN'T REALLY HAVE ONE
WITHOUT THE OTHER OR CAN YOU? JEETU:
IT IS JUST THAT THE ABILITY TO ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE, YOU DON'T
HAVE TO KEEP IT ALL IN YOUR HEAD.
WHAT YOU CAN BE ABLE TO DO IS GET UP FAR BROADER RANGE OF
KNOWLEDGE THAT CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE TO YOU BUT THE
QUALITY OF QUESTIONS WILL DETERMINE THE KIND OF KNOWLEDGE
THAT GETS MADE AVAILABLE TO YOU. IF YOU KNOW HOW TO ASK THE
RIGHT QUESTIONS, YOU WILL HAVE A VERY DIFFERENT OUTCOME THAN
IF YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS, SO THIS IS
THE THING THAT YOU HAVE TO CHART -- START TEACHING
STUDENTS ABOUT. IT'S NOT THAT DIFFERENT FROM
LEADERSHIP. THE QUALITY OF QUESTIONS YOU
ASK YOUR TEAMS IS BETTER THAN HAVING ALL THE ANSWERS.
THE QUALITY OF QUESTIONS DETERMINE YOUR SUCCESS RATES.
EMILY: WHAT DOES THIS LOOK LIKE IN
PRACTICE? IS THIS ABOUT TEACHING STUDENTS
HOW TO PROMPT LANGUAGE MODELS? JEETU:
IT IS ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT NOT ONLY THE STUDENTS KNOW HOW
TO TAKE EVERY INDIVIDUAL IS GOING TO BE A MANAGER OF
AGENTS, WE WILL HAVE AGENTS AT OUR DISPOSAL.
WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO BEST UTILIZE THEM TO DO WORK ON
OUR BEHALF. THAT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT
THAT HAS TO BE MADE. IF WE CAN TEACH STUDENTS FROM A
VERY EARLY AGE TO BE AI NATIVE AND KNOW THAT YOU ARE GOING TO
HAVE ALL THESE RESOURCES AT YOUR DISPOSAL BUT THE WAY YOU
DEPLOY THOSE RESOURCES IS GOING TO BE THE DIFFERENCE MAKER WHO,
THAT'S A VERY DIFFERENT SKILL TO LEARN THAT WOULD TELL YOU THERE'S NO HARM IN HAVING A
CERTAIN LEVEL OF INSIGHT. EVEN OPEN BOOK EXAMS UP UNTIL
NOW ONLY HAPPEN IN SELECT COURSES, SO NOW YOU'RE GOING
FROM THESE OPEN BOOK EXAMS TO AI AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE AND
HAVING ALL THE COMPUTE AVAILABLE TO YOU SO THAT YOU
CAN MAKE SURE YOU CAN GET THE BEST POSSIBLE ANSWER TO A
PROBLEM YOU'RE TRYING TO SOLVE, BUT THIS NOTION OF
PROBLEM-SOLVING GETS TO BE THE CENTRAL PIECE OF EDUCATION
MOVING FORWARD. EMILY: RIGHT, PROBLEM-SOLVING,
CRITICAL THINKING, OBVIOUSLY VERY IMPORTANT THINGS THAT
CHILDREN NEED TO LEARN EARLY ON. I'M WONDERING IF YOU THINK
MAYBE THERE IS A MINIMUM AGE FOR WHEN AI SHOWS UP IN THE
CLASSROOM? OR THIS IS SOMETHING THAT EVEN
PRESCHOOLERS, KINDERGARTNERS SHOULD START ADAPTING?
IS THERE A CERTAIN PERIOD OF DEVELOPMENT WHERE YOU WANT TO
BE COMPLETELY AI FREE? JEETU: THAT'S A REALLY GOOD QUESTION,
I HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THAT, I HAVE A 15-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER AND
SHE GOT INTO TECHNOLOGY PRETTY EARLY IN HER LIFE, WE WANTED TO
MAKE SURE WE DIDN'T HAVE HER ONLY DOING THAT SO THERE WERE
CERTAIN KIND OF TACTILE SKILLS WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE, SO I
THINK YOUR QUESTION IS A REALLY GOOD ONE, LIKE YOU MIGHT NOT
WANT TO HAVE AI AVAILABLE AT THREE YEARS OF AGE OR FOUR
YEARS OF AGE, YOU MIGHT WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE ARE CERTAIN
FOUNDATIONAL SKILLS THAT GET TAUGHT FIRST AND THEN YOU GET
TO AN AI AS PART OF THE PICTURE. MY THINKING IS LIKE ONCE YOU
GET TO LIKE 7, 8, 9, YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THAT
INSTINCT FOR HOW IT IS GOING TO WORK AND THEN USE THAT AS A
MASSIVE ACCELERATOR BUT YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR
FIRST PRINCIPLE FOUNDATIONAL SKILLS ARE IN PLACE.
I HAVEN'T THOUGHT ABOUT THIS ENOUGH.
I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO CHANGE MY MIND ABOUT WHAT AGE YOU
SHOULD GET INTO IT. ROMAINE: FAIR ENOUGH.
I'M CURIOUS ABOUT CISCO'S INVOLVEMENT IN THIS AND WHAT
THE OPPORTUNITY, THE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY IS FROM SCHOOLS AND
UNIVERSITIES AS WE START TO SEE MORE OF THIS TECHNOLOGY
INTEGRATED IN SOME FORM OR ANOTHER. JEETU:
THE ROLE WE WANT TO PLAY A CISCO IS ANY TIME THERE WAS A
TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTION THAT WE ARE EXPERIENCING RIGHT NOW
WHICH IS A SEISMIC SHIFT, YOU WILL FIND THERE WILL BE SOME
JOBS THAT ARE LOST, VIRTUALLY EVERY JOB IS GOING TO GET
RE-FACTORED AND NET NEW CATEGORIES OF JOBS WILL BE
CREATED. WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS MAKE SURE
THAT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE THAT MIGHT LOSE THEIR JOBS, YOU
WANT TO UPSKILL SOCIETY AS FAST AS POSSIBLE SO THE SUFFERING IS
MINIMIZED. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE
THE RIGHT LEVEL OF SKILLS THAT ARE IN DEMAND RIGHT NOW THAT
ARE EFFECTIVELY TRAINED WITH MULTIPLE DIFFERENT VENUES AND
WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE CAN HELP DO THAT.
THAT IS WHAT CISCO HAS BEEN THINKING ABOUT.
ONE OF THE THINGS IN THE TECH INDUSTRY THAT HISTORICALLY HAVE
NEVER BEEN A BIG FAN OF IS WE TAKE THE DOWNSIDE EFFECTS OF
TECHNOLOGY AS A MATTER OF FACT, LIKE THAT IS THE COST OF
DISRUPTION, SOME PEOPLE WILL LOSE THEIR JOBS.
THAT IS REAL SUFFERING THAT HAPPENS SO YOU WANT TO MAKE
SURE YOU CAN COLLECTIVELY AS A TECH COMMUNITY, AS A SOCIETY AT
LARGE BE INVOLVED IN UPSKILLING THE ENTIRE WORKFORCE SO THEY
CAN HAVE THE RELEVANT TIME AND SKILLS. ROMAINE:
BUT AS YOU ARE MAKING THIS PUSH THIS PIGGYBACKS OFF WHAT EMILY
WAS ASKING ABOUT ABOUT THE RIGHT AGE, WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN
SOME SCHOOLS RETRENCH FROM THIS WITH CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
KICKING GEMINI OUT FOR NOW. THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS BY
PARENTS ABOUT WHAT THEIR CHILDREN ARE BEING EXPOSED TO,
THE DATA THAT IS BEING COLLECTED, WHO IS GOING TO OWN
IT. WHEN WE HEAR ABOUT THESE VARIOUS BREACHES AND THINGS
LIKE THAT, THE IDEA AS TO WHETHER THE PERSONAL
INFORMATION ABOUT MY CHILD IS GOING TO BE SOMEHOW PROTECTED
AS WELL AND NOT SHARED BEYOND WHATEVER THE PARENTS AGREE TO
UPFRONT. JEETU: I THINK THE RESERVATION AROUND
LET'S MAKE SURE THAT THE CHILD IS MATURE ENOUGH AND HAS THE
CORE FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES IN PLACE AND THE CORE VALUES IN
PLACE BEFORE YOU START EQUIPPING THEM WITH AN
EXCESSIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IS A VERY SOUND ARGUMENT.
YOU JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU DON'T WAIT FOR SO LONG THAT
THEY DON'T HAVE AN INSTINCT FOR IT AND THAT INSTINCT DEVELOPS
TOO LATE. IT IS A FINE BALANCE TO BE MADE.
YOU DON'T NEED TO START SOMEONE AT THREE YEARS OLD BECAUSE THEY
MIGHT NOT HAVE THE MATURITY TO GO OUT AND ABSORB THE THINGS
THEY MIGHT GET FROM AI, AND THEN OVER TIME YOU MIGHT NOT
WANT TO WAIT UNTIL YOU ARE 21 TO DO IT EITHER BECAUSE THAT
MIGHT BE TOO LATE. THERE IS A FINE BALANCE OF WHEN
YOU START GETTING SUPPOSED TO TECHNOLOGY AND THAT MATURITY
LEVEL YOU WOULD EXPECT FROM THE KIDS NEEDS TO BE THERE BEFORE
YOU CAN EXPOSE THEM IN THE RIGHT WAY. ROMAINE:
ALL RIGHT, GREAT CONVERSATION. WE'VE GOT TO GET YOU BACK ON A
LONGER ONE. JEETU PATEL, THE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF PRODUCT OFFICER OVER AT CISCO, AND ONE OF THOSE
CONCERNS DOES REVOLVE AROUND THE WORLD OF SECURITY AND THAT
HAS RAISED SOME OPPORTUNITIES FOR A LOT OF THE CYBERSECURITY
COMPANIES. OUR NEXT GUEST RUNS SENTINEL
ONE AND THEY RECENTLY JOINED THE EARNINGS PARADE.
GOING US IS THE COFOUNDER, CHAIRMAN, AND CEO.
BEFORE WE GET TO SOME OF THE NUMBERS OUT OF YOUR MOST RECENT
REPORT, I DID WANT TO PIGGYBACK WHERE WE LEFT OFF.
AND I HAVE SEEN REPORTS FROM YOUR OWN RESEARCHERS AND I'M
GOING TO QUOTE SPECIFICALLY. YOU SAY THE MODEL IS THE
MALWARE AND THIS IS BECOMING A BIG CONCERN.
MAYBE THIS IS A CONCERN FOR SCHOOLS AND PARENTS ALSO, THE
AI ROLLOUT IS GOING FAST AND FURIOUS, BUT I DON'T REALLY
KNOW WHO IS PROTECTING US RIGHT NOW? >> THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION AND
I THINK IT IS TWOFOLD. ONE IS THE SAFETY OF THESE
MODELS THEMSELVES. WE TALKED ABOUT PUTTING THESE
THINGS IN CLASSROOMS. DO WE KNOW EXACTLY HOW THE MODEL
WORKS? DO WE HAVE ALL THE PATTERNS OF
PAY -- BEHAVIOR IDENTIFIED? DO WE KNOW HOW IT AFFECTS OUR
NEUROLOGICAL EVOLUTION? WE DON'T REALLY HAVE THE
ANSWERS TO ALL OF THOSE. ON TOP OF THAT WE ARE SEEING
MELISSA'S -- MALICIOUS USAGE OF THESE MODELS.
THEY'RE WAITING FROM PROMPTS FROM HUMANS AND HUMANS CAN USE
THEM FOR WHATEVER PURPOSE THEY CHOOSE AND WE ARE SEEING
CYBERCRIME GROUPS, NATIONSTATE ADVERSARIES, THEY ARE MISUSING
THESE MODELS TO SCALE THEIR ATTACKS AND GO AFTER OUR
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE. THE UNDERBELLY OF OUR ENTIRE
DIGITAL REALM IS NOW INFUSED WITH THE OLD INFRASTRUCTURE AND
SOFTWARE THAT IS JUST NOT UP TO PAR WITH THE MODEL USAGE AND
THE CAPABILITIES OF SOME OF THESE MODELS. ROMAINE:
BASED ON WHAT YOU RCN, ARE THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICERS OUT
THERE, ARE THEY GETTING SORT OF THESE INCREMENTAL BUDGETS FOR
AI SECURITY? WE KNOW THE MONEY IS THERE IF
YOU WANT TO BUILD A DATA CENTER OR BUILD OUT THE
INFRASTRUCTURE, BUT IS THERE MONEY BEING ALLOTTED FOR THE
SECURITY? TOMER: ABSOLUTELY. WE ARE SEEING MORE DEMAND, WE
ARE SEEING MORE OF THESE BUDGETS DIRECTED SPECIFICALLY TO SECURE AI AS FOLKS ADOPT AI
BUT WHAT IS INTERESTING IS THERE IS NO SET MODEL AS TO HOW
YOU DO AI SECURITY. RIGHT NOW THERE WAS ALSO NOT A
SOLUTION, MAY BE THERE NEVER WILL BE A BULLETPROOF SOLUTION,
SO THE IDEA THAT WE CAN JUST USE THIS TECHNOLOGY INHERENTLY
SAFELY I THINK IS A BIT MISGUIDED.
I THINK WE ARE LEANING ON COMPUTER LABS TO MAKE SURE THEY
PUT ENOUGH SAFEGUARDS INTO THEIR MODELS AND TYPICALLY THEY
DO AND THEY DO THE BEST THEY CAN TO ACHIEVE THAT, BUT YOU
ALSO HAVE OPEN-SOURCE MODELS AND IN THE CASE OF OPEN SOURCE
MODELS, YOU CAN REALLY STRIP OUT ANY TYPE OF SAFEGUARD AND
USE THEM FOR WHATEVER YOU WANT, SO WE ARE ENTERING THIS VERY
INTERESTING PERIOD OF TIME, WHERE THE DEFENSE AND HOW YOU
DEFEND YOURSELF FROM THESE ATTACKS IS NOT ENTIRELY CLEAR.
WITH NEW CAPABILITIES THAT ARE DESIGNED TO ALWAYS MONITOR WITH
THESE MODELS ARE DOING, ESSENTIALLY TRYING TO
CONTINUOUSLY VET THE BEHAVIOR OF THE MODEL WITHOUT MAKING ANY
ASSUMPTIONS THAT IT IS GOING TO DO GOOD OR BAD.
BUT THE MODELS AND HOW YOU SECURE THIS, SO IT HAS ALL BEEN
BUILT AS CUSTOMERS. EMILY: HOW DO YOU DIFFERENTIATE YOURSELF IN THE CYBERSECURITY
SPACE WHEN THEY ARE TRYING TO CONVINCE THEM TO GO WITH
SENTINEL ONE. TOMER:
OUR APPROACH HAS BEEN THERE FOR ABOUT A DECADE AND WE BELIEVE
IN CYBERSECURITY. WE BELIEVE THE SPEED AT WHICH
ATTACKS MOVE AND THE SCALE OF WHAT WE SEE REALLY NECESSITATES
A COMPLETE, AUTONOMOUS SOFTWARE THAT CAN DETECT AND PROTECT IN
REAL TIME AND REMEDIATE ANY THING THAT HAS BEEN MADE.
WE ARE ONE OF THE ONLY VENDORS IN THE WORLD TODAY THAT CAN
PROVIDE THAT, IN PUBLIC CLOUD, IN REGULATED ENVIRONMENT,
FEDERALLY BUT ALSO FOR SCHOOLS. IT’S AN AMAZING PIECE OF
SOFTWARE THAT RUNS AUTONOMOUSLY. SCALES DEFENDERS FROM ATTACKS
AND ALL IN ALL, WE ARE BIG BELIEVERS THAT THE NEXT STAGE
IN SIGNER SECURITY IS GOING TO BE WAGE WITH AUTONOMOUS
SECURITY, NOT NECESSARILY MORE PEOPLE AND CONSULTANTS, MACHINE
HANDS ON KEYBOARDS BUT WITH SOFTWARE THAT CAN SCALE WHAT
THEY DO. EMILY: ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUE $1.22
BILLION. BEATING ESTIMATES FOR THE
SECOND QUARTER. REVENUE BEAT. WHAT’S GOING TO DRIVE GROWTH
GOING FORWARD? TOMER: IN MANY WAYS OUR EMERGING
SOLUTION SETS HAVE ACCELERATED IN THIS PAST QUARTER AND EVEN
IN THE QUARTER BEFORE. WE’RE AT THIS JUNCTURE THAT
SITS THERE AND REALLY PROVIDES THE FABRIC FOR ALL OF OUR
CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS. WHEN WE THINK ABOUT WHERE
MODELS AND AGENTS ACTUALLY RUN, THEY RUN ON ADMINISTRATION, ON
WORKLOADS. ON END POINTS. THAT’S WHAT SENTINELONE IS
DOING. SENTINELONE HAS DESIGNED A
SYSTEM TO PROTECT END POINTS AND THE HUMANS USING THEM FROM
EXACTLY THESE TYPES OF ATTACKS AND THAT’S WHERE WE SEE AN
IMMENSE AMOUNT OF GROWTH. THERE’S A HUGE MARKET IN INFO
PROTECTION. THESE LEGACY SOLUTIONS ARE NOT
ABLE TO KEEP UP WITH ATTACKS SO WE’RE SEEING A LOT OF FOLKS NOW
STARTING TO MIGRATE AWAY FROM THESE INCUMBENT SOLUTIONS AND
INTO MODERN PROTECTION SOLUTIONS.
RILEY WE ALL KNOW, THE BIGGER PLAYERS OUT THERE, GOOGLES,
MICROSOFTS, PALO ALTO NETWORKS ARE WHETHER SHING SECURITY
PLATFORMS. WHY SENTINELONE AS OPPOSED TO GOING TO THOSE OTHER
NAMES? TOMER: I THINK IT’S THE AUTONOMOUS
NATURE OF THE PLATFORM. THERE AREN’T MANY PLATFORMS OUT
THERE THAT ARE COMPLETELY HOLISTIC AND CAN WORK OUT OF
THE BOX WITH NO LENGTHY INTEGRATION OR CONSULTANCY WORK.
PALO ALTO, GREAT COMPANY BUT THEY HAVE SEVEN OR EIGHT
DIFFERENT PLATFORMS THEY HAVE TO PUT TOGETHER TO EVEN GET TO
THE POINT OF GETTING THE RIGHT VISIBILITY INTO YOUR
ENVIRONMENT. I THINK THAT COMPLEXITY LEAST
MORE GAPS FOR ATTACKERS TO GO AFTER.
WE SECURE SOME OF THE MOST DISCERNING ORGANIZATIONS IN THE
WORLD TODAY. SOME OF THE BIGGEST COMPANIES,
CLEARLY THEY LOOK AT THE EFFICACY OF OUR PRODUCT, OF OUR
CYBERSECURITY PLATFORM IS SOMETHING T THAT CAN BE
DEPLOYED IN REALTIME WITHOUT THAT HUMAN INTERVENTION.
ROMAINE: TOMER WEINGARTEN, REALLY
APPRECIATE IT. SENTINELONE FOUNDER AND C.E.O.
OPENAI RELEASED AN OPEN LETTER YESTERDAY CALLED A COLLECTIVE
ACTION ON CYBERDEFENSE. THE CHATGPT OPERATOR JOINING
REQUEST 130 OTHER COMPANIES, INCLUDING ANTHROPIC ISSUING
THIS CALL TO ACTION. ONE OF THE SIGNATURE TOURS ON
THAT WAS OLIVER WEINMAN. WE CAUGHT UP WITH TED MOYNIHAN
TO TALK ABOUT THIS. TAKE A LISTEN. >> WE THOUGHT THIS WAS REALLY
TIMELY AND THOUGHT IT NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT THAT THE SPEED
AND DEVELOPMENT OF AI AND PARTICULARLY THE CYBERRISKS BUT
OTHER RISKS ARE AMPLIFYING VERY, VERY QUICKLY.
THE LETTER CALLS THAT OUT AND ALSO POINTS OUT THAT THIS IS A
COLLECTIVE ACTION PROBLEM. ROMAINE:
IS THAT SOMETHING YOU’VE BEEN SEEING IN YOUR ROLE AT OLIVER
WEINMAN. YOU’VE BEEN ADVISING C.E.O.’S
AT OTHER COMPANIES NOW FOR DECADES.
WERE YOU SEEING THIS AMONG OTHERS IN THE C-SUITE? >> ABSOLUTELY.
GOVERNMENT, ALSO AI COMPANIES, ALL FEELING THAT THIS IS A
RAPIDLY GROWING PROBLEM. I’M FROM IRELAND.
WE HAVE A SAYING THERE THAT IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO SOLVE A HARD
PROBLEM. THIS IS JUST THAT HARD PROBLEM.
IT REQUIRES THE WHOLE SYSTEM TO WORK TOGETHER AND REALLY TO
RAISE THE FOCUS ON THIS. RILEY I AM CURIOUS, TOO, ABOUT
THIS IDEA. THIS LETTER COMES AT A TIME
WHERE EVERYONE IS WORRIED ABOUT THE HUGGINS CASE ABOUT IT GOING
OFF THE RAILS. I MEAN THE ROYAL WE, LIQUID
LARGE, DO WE PUT OUR STOCK THAT THE CORPORATIONS AND OTHER
FOLKS THAT SIGNED OFF ON THIS LETTER INCLUDING OPENAI ITSELF
ARE THE ONES THAT CAN’T ACTUALLY BE THE GATEKEEPERS OR
SENTINELS TO PROTECT US? >> IT’S A GREAT QUESTION.
AI HAS BEEN BUILT BY TECHNOLOGIESES AND TECHNOLOGY
COMPANIES BUT AI DEPENDS ON ALL OF US SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT
REALLY RELIES ON THE ACTION OF ALL OF US.
I DO THINK THE LETTER CALLS OUT THAT AI COMPANIES NEED TO ACT
AS WELL, NEED TO CREATE FRAMEWORKS SHARED WITH
INDUSTRIES, PARTICULARLY WITH THE MORE CRITICAL PARTS OF OUR
INFRASTRUCTURE, HOSPITALS AND SO ON. AND THAT THERE IS A
RESPONSIBILITY ON COMPANIES, CYBERCOMPANIES AS WELL AS
INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT. I WELCOME THAT BEING CALLED OUT.
ROMAINE: ARE WE MOVING TOO FAST? WITH REGARDS TO YOU BEING PART
OF THIS LETTER, IS THERE SOME SENSE HERE THAT FOLKS ARE
CALLING FOR SOME SORT OF SLOWDOWN OF THE DEPLOYMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT OF SOME OF THESE AI MODELS? TED:
I ALWAYS SAY TO PEOPLE WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW IN THE AI KIND OF
TRANSFORMATION THAT WE’RE GOING THROUGH IS KIND OF NOT MESSY
MIDDLE. FOR A FEW YEARS PEOPLE WERE
JUST GETTING TO GRIPS WITH THE TECHNOLOGY AND WHAT IT WAS ABLE
TO DO AND ROLLOUTS. BUT NOW WE’RE IN A PHASE WHERE
PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO SCALE INNOVATION AND TRANSFORMATION
AND ENABLE OUR WHOLE ORGANIZATIONS AND THAT’S MESSY
AND THAT’S GOING TO BE HAPPENING OVER THE NEXT FEW
YEARS. IN THAT ENVIRONMENT, IT DOES
REQUIRE A SENSE OF CONFIDENCE AND CLARITY AND SECURITY TO
MAKE THE NEXT WAVES OF INVESTMENT.
FROM THE BOARD THROUGH THE C.E.O.
THROUGH THE ORGANIZATION SO I THINK TO MAKE THE NEXT STEP
NOW, THAT IS WHAT IS REQUIRED. SECURITY, CLARITY, CONFIDENCE
AND TRUST AND THAT IS WHY I THINK THIS IS A REALLY
IMPORTANT ISSUE RIGHT NOW. EMILY:
OUR THANKS TO TED MOYNIHAN FROM OLIVER WEINMAN.
LET’S LOOK AT MARKETS AS WE MARCH CLOSER TO THE CLOSING
BELL. WE HAVE EQUITIES SELLING OFF.
MOST MOVEMENT OUT OF SMALL CAPS, INTEREST RATES SENSITIVE
PARTS OF THE MARKET. YOU CAN SEE THE RUSSELL 2000
AND FLAT. THAT IS THE TERM TO DESCRIBE
WHAT THE YIELD KUFIC IS DOING. FLATTENING.
THE 10-YEAR YIELD UP ABOUT 12 BASIS POINTS AS TRADERS PARSE
THROUGH WE’RE GOING TO BE SEEING RATE HIKES POTENTIALLY
IN SEPTEMBER? AND THAT’S LIFTING THE DOLLAR.
ROMAINE: WE BRING IN SASHA, CHIEF
STRATEGIST AT INTERACTIVE BROKERS. YOU ANSWER THAT.
ARE WE GOING TO GET A RATE HIKE THEN? >> I DON’T THINK.
I’VE BEEN IN THE DECEMBER CAMP FOR A WHILE AND NOT NECESSARILY
FOR ECONOMIC REASONS, IT’S FOR POLITICAL REASONS.
THINKING ABOUT HOW WARSH GOT THE JOB AND WHO HAD TO APPOINT
HIM TO THE JOB. WE KNOW THAT THE PRESIDENT IS
STRONGLY IN FAVOR OF CUTTING INTEREST RATES.
I THINK WARSH REALIZES THAT’S A NONSTARTER BUT I THINK HE DOES
NOT WANT TO GO OUT OF HIS WAY TO ANTAGONIZE THE PRESIDENT BY
RAISING RATES BEFORE THE MIDDLE TERMS. UNLESS THERE’S SOME
CATASTROPHE TROPHIC PRINT. WE’RE GOING TO GET TOUGH TALK
OUT OF THE FED AND NOT A LOT OF ACTION AND THAT’S PROBLEMATIC.
ROMAINE: BUT WE HAVE TWO MEETINGS BEFORE
THE MIDDLE TERMS. AS HE POINTED OUT, 62 MONTHS NOW WE’VE BEEN
ABOVE THAT 2% FED TARGET. IT’S TIME TO ACT, WHAT ARE WE
WAITING FOR? >> THAT’S A QUESTION MORE FOR
WARSH. ROMAINE: I’M SORRY, GO AHEAD. >> WE’VE GONE UP FROM LIKE A
35% TO 65% PROBABILITY FOR SEPTEMBER.
TO ME, OCTOBER IS OFF -- 90% PROBABILITY FOR OCTOBER.
THAT TO ME IS OFF THE TABLE. I CAN’T SEE THEM DOING ANYTHING
BARRING SOMETHING TRULY CATASTROPHIC LITERALLY THE WEEK
BEFORE THE MIDDLE TERMS. RILEY WHAT’S THE POWER MESSAGE-WISE,
A 25 BASIS POINT HIKE? THAT’S NOT GOING TO DERAIL THE
ECONOMY OR THE MARKET BUT THAT WOULD SEND A SIGNAL THAT THAT’S
BACKING UP YOUR WORDS. >> IN A NON-POLITICAL WORLD,
ARE YOU 100% RIGHT. 25% BASIS POINTS IS NOT GOING
TO DO ANYTHING. BETH SAID IT’S AS EASY AS THEY
COME AND I DON’T DISAGREE WITH HER. THE BLOOMBERG LIKEDY INDEXS, THEY’RE ALL SCREAM SCREAMING.
BUT I THINK THAT’S THE PROBLEM. I THINK IT’S SMARTER
ECONOMICALLY FOR HIM TO ACT NOW, GET THAT OFF THE TABLE,
WE’RE ACTIVE, WE’RE MOVING. I DON’T KNOW THAT THERE’S THE
POLITICAL WILL TO DO THAT AND THAT’S I THINK WHY WE’RE AT 60,
NOT 9 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. EMILY:
DO EQUITY TRADERS CARE ABOUT THE CREDIBILITY OF THE FED?
WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? >> THEY SHOULD, THEY DON’T
NECESSARILY. I THINK THAT’S WHY WE’RE ONLY
DOWN 20 POINTS ON THIS MOVE AS OPPOSED TO DOWN MORE
SIGNIFICANTLY WITH 12 BASIS POINTS ON THE SNORT END.
MY INITIAL REACTION WAS, LIKE GENTLEMEN, FEEL FREE TO RESUME
YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED RALLY. WHAT WAS THE FIRST THINGS THAT
STOCK SAID? WHEN WARSH LEFT THE PODIUM,
STOCKS RALLIED BECAUSE IT’S A FRIDAY, IT’S A QUIET DAY.
SO OFF WE WENT WITHOUT ACTUALLY ANY REGARD TO IT AND THEN
FINALLY THE WEIGHT OF MONEY KIND OF MADE PEOPLE STEP BACK
AND THINK. STOCK TRADERS, AS LONG AS THEY
CAN JUSTIFY THEM WITH DECENT EARNINGS AND YESTERDAY NVIDIA
WENT A LONG WAY TO THAT AND THERE WAS A HUGE ROTATION.
A FAIRLY SIGNIFICANT DECENT-SIZED RALLY AND YET ONE
SECTOR ONLY UP IN THE S&P 500. EMILY: I.T. >> THAT WAS IT. 10 DOWN, ONE UP.
AND 200 S&P STOCKS LOWER MORE THAN ADVANCERS.
WE’RE SORT OF SEEING THE HANG OVER FROM THAT BUT IF THE RIGHT
COMPANIES DO THE RIGHT THINGS, THE STOCK MARKET CAN JUST SORT
OF CARRY ON. EMILY: SO THAT’S WHAT’S GOING TO CARRY
US THEN UNTIL WE GET MAYBE A LITTLE MORE CLARITY FROM THE
FED. CARRY ON, KEEP BUYING NVIDIA.
BECAUSE SOME OF THESE CHIPS ARE SELLING OFF. >> I’M NOT A HUGE SEASONALITIES
PERSON BUT IT BEHOOVES US TO THINK ABOUT SEPTEMBER A LITTLE
BIT DIFFERENT -- DIFFERENTLY. ONE OF TWO THINGS CAN HAPPEN.
ONE, WE COULD GET A HIKE. ALSO, WE’VE SEEN SITUATIONS
WHERE THE STOCKS SORT OF PETER OUT AND YOU SEE IT TODAY WITH
NVIDIA. IT’S UNDER A BIT OF PROFIT
TAKING. TO ME WHAT HAPPENED YESTERDAY
WAS, FOR THE KIND OF RALLIES WE SAW, YOU HAD INSTITUTIONAL
"MONEY FLOWING" IN AND THAT’S SORT OF WASHING
IN, WASHING OUT. IT’S LIKE WE CAN’T BE MOMENTUM
TRADERS TO THAT DEGREE ALL THE TIME. RILEY STEVE SOSNICK. NVIDIA SHARES DOWN 5% AFTER
YESTERDAY’S 9% GAME. ALL OF THE MAJOR INDICES IN THE
RED ON THE DAY BUT STILL AHEAD ON THE DAY AND IN THE MONTH OF
AUGUST. A BLAKEDOWN OF ALL OF TODAY’S PRICE ACTION STARTS
RIGHT NOW. >> THE CLOSING BELL.
BLOOMBERG’S COMPREHENSIVE CROSS-PLATFORM COVERAGE OF THE
U.S. MARKETS CLOSE STARTS RIGHT NOW.
RILEY TWO MINUTES AWAY FROM THE ENDS OF THE TRADING DAY.
TAKING YOU THROUGH TO THE CLOSING BELL WITH THE GLOBAL
SIMULCAST. WE’RE JOINED BY TIM STENOVEC AND LISA MATEO IN
TODAY FOR CAROL MASSAR. A MARKET THAT HAS CLEARLY MADE
CLEAR WHAT IT THOUGHT OF THAT BIG SPEECH MADE BY KEVIN WARSH
EARLIER TODAY. TIM: I DON’T WANT TO STEAL YOUR
THUNDER, ROMAINE, BUT THE BOND MARKET REACTION.
TWO-YEAR YIELDS UP 12 BASIS POINTS RIGHT NOW?
BASIC LIB STARTING AT 10:00 A.M. ROMAINE:
UP TO THROW IT OUT THERE AND THAT BIG JUMP ON THE SHORT END
OF THE CURVE. NO ACTIVITY REALLY ON THE LONG
END OF THE CURVE. 340-YEAR YIELD UP ABOUT 2 BASIS
POINTS. THAT’S THE STORY. AND THE NEXT MOVE TO THE FED
WILL BE TO HIKE RATES AND PROBABLY SOONER THAN LATER.
EMILY: WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE RUSSELL
2000 SMALL CAPS ARE SELLING OFF THE MOST TODAY BY A PRETTY BIG
DIVERGENCE FROM THE S&P 500. LISA:
THE BLOOMBERG DOLLAR SPOT INDEX IS UP BY ABOUT .3%.
SO WE’RE WATCHING THE DOLLAR CLOSELY TOO. ROMAINE:
SO MUCH NEWS ABOUT THAT DEBASEMENT TRADE COMING OUT OF SECRETARY BESSENT AND THE
MOVETHE DROP IN THE DOLLAR BEING REVERSED TODAY.
A LOT OF QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW IS A LOT OF PEOPLE MAYBE DEPART
FOR THE NEXT WEEK OR SO UNTIL AFTER THE LABOR DAY HOLIDAY. IF YOU HAVE YOUR CALENDAR OUT,
MARK DOWN SEPTEMBER 16, THE NEXT FED DECISION DAY.
OCTOBER 28 IS THE NEXT AFTER THAT.
ELECTION DAY IS NOVEMBER 3 IN THE U.S.
THE FINAL FED MEETING ON DECEMBER 9. U.S.
EQUITY MARKETS, THE LOSS IS A RELATIVELY FRACTIONAL.
DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE DOWN 10 POINTS.
THE S&P DOWN 20, ONE QUARTER OF A PERCENT.
THE NASDAQ DOWN 139 POINTS, HALF A PERCENT.
THE NASDAQ 100 DOWN .7%. THE RUSSELL 2000 TAKING THE
BIGGEST FRONT OF THE SELLOFF, DOWN ABOUT 1.4%. LISA:
YOU ARE NOT LEAVING US NEXT WE COME ARE YOU? TIM: REALLY?
YOU ARE GONE? ROMAINE:'S
BEEN GREAT WORKING HERE. TIM: WE WILL SEE WHO SHOWS UP ON
MONDAY. WE DID SEE 230 STOCKS AT HIGHER. 272 MOVE LOWER. EMILY:
YESTERDAY THERE WAS ONLY ONE SECTOR IN THE GREEN AND IT WAS
TECH. MORE OF A MIXED BAG TODAY. CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY,
COMMUNICATION SERVICES, ENERGY, STAPLES. WHAT IS THE LAGGARD?
IT IS I.T. SOME DAYS YOU ARE UP AND SOME
YOU ARE DOWN, ALL AFTER THE FED MEETING. TIM:
SOME OF THE STOCKS THAT MOVED HIGHER TODAY. GAINERS.
LOOK AT THIS. CAP HIGHER -- GAP HIGHER BY
CLOSE TO 13%. THEY HAD MICHAEL FRANCIS TO
HEAD OF THE OLD NAVY BRAND. PROFIT OUTPACED ESTIMATE AND
OFFSET A SALES DECLINE AT OLD NAVY AND LOWER SALES GUIDANCE.
FRANCIS WILL TAKE OVER ON NOVEMBER 2.
THE CURRENT CEO WILL TRANSITION TO AN ADVISORY ROLE.
IT FOLLOWS A SALES DECLINE AT OLD NAVY AND THE COMPANY
TRIMMED THE UPPER RANGE OF THE OTHER 426.
INVESTORS CHEERING THE OVERALL RESULTS FROM GAP, HIGHER TODAY
BY 13%. SHARES OF THE BUY NOW PAY LATER
FINTECH COMPANY WERE HIGHER TODAY IS 17% EARLIER IN THE
SESSION. A STEADY MOVE LOWER, FINISHING
THE DAY IN THE GREEN. THE COMPANY DID HIT IN INTRADAY
HIGH GOING BACK TO SEPTEMBER OF 2025.
THE HIGHEST INTRADAY SINCE THEN AFTER THE COMPANY FORECAST
REVENUE FOR THE FIRST QUARTER THAT BEAT THE AVERAGE ANALYST
ESTIMATE. WE SPOKE WITH MAX ALEXION, THE
COMPANY'S CEO AND HE SAID AMERICAN CONSUMERS, THE
CONSUMERS HE VIEWS. HE SAYS THEY ARE HEALTHY RIGHT
NOW. FINALLY TAKING A LOOK AT SOME
OF THOSE SPORTS BETTING COMPANIES.
DRAFTKINGS AND FLUTTER SHARES WERE HIGHER TODAY.
DRAFTKINGS UP BY 4.3%. WE DID SEE THEM MOVE HIGHER
MIDDAY AFTER NEW YORK -- AFTER KALSHI FACED A SETBACK IN A U.S.
APPEALS COURT. THE PREDICTION MARKET.
YOU CAN DO A LOT OF WHAT YOU DO WHEN IT COMES TO SPORTS BETTING
ON KALSHI. IT IS NOT CONSIDERED SPORTS
BETTING, AT LEAST BY LEGAL ENTITIES. THE CFTC. ROMAINE:
IT IS PREDICTIVE. TIM:
IT IS PREDICTING, AT LEAST THAT IS WHAT THE CFTC SAYS.
THIS IS SOMETHING NOT GOING AWAY ANYTIME SOON.
KALSHI FACES A CHALLENGE ON A STATE-BY-STATE BASIS.
THIS IS THE LATEST SETBACK FOR THE COMPANY.
FLUTTER SHARES HIGHER TODAY BY 7.1%. THE SPORTS BOOKS HAVE BEEN
PRETTY BEAT UP AS PEOPLE HAVE MOVED AWAY FROM TRADITIONAL
SPORTS BOOKS AND GONE TO RIVALS LIKE POLYMARKET AND KALSHI.
LISA: I WANTED TO GET TO DECLINERS.
PAYPAL DOWN ABOUT 12%. HERE'S WHY.
THERE'S A GROUP FROM ADVENT STRIPE NOT GOING ALONG WITH
THEIR $50 BILLION PURSUIT OF THE COMPANY.
THAT WAS A BIG BLOW. THAT WAS NOT GOOD NEWS FOR THE
COMPANY. IT WOULD HAVE RANKED AS ONE OF
THE BIGGEST EVER LEVERAGED BUYOUT'S IF IT HAD GONE THROUGH.
PAYPAL, THE THING IS THEY ARE STRUGGLING.
MODERNIZATION IN PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES HAVE BEEN A
PROBLEM FOR THE COMPANY. RIVALS LIKE APPLE, ALPHABET
HAVE SEIZED THE MARKET SHARE. YOU HAVE THE COMPANY.
THEY OUSTED THEIR CEO EARLIER THIS YEAR AND HAVE A NEW CEO IN
THE SPOT. HE IS SAYING IT IS SPECIFIC
FINANCIAL GOALS FOR THE COMPANY. HE WANTS TO CHANGE OUT REPORTS
EARNINGS AND HOW THEY ASSIGN EACH LINE OF BUSINESS.
SPECIFIC REVENUE TARGET FOR THE COMPANY SHARES DOWN ABOUT 12%.
ANOTHER DOWNER. THIS WAS ON THE UPSIDE
YESTERDAY. NVIDIA SHARES ALSO ARE DOWN
LOWER. WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES.
THE LEADER IN AI CHIPS COMING OFF A HUGE RALLY. PROJECTED SALES GROWTH OF 70%
FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. YESTERDAY IT ADDED ABOUT $442
BILLION IN MARKET VALUE. WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT
DIFFERENT EXPERTS. THEY ARE SAYING, WHY THE DIP?
THEY SAY DOES NOT SYSTEMIC. IT COULD BE INTEREST RELATED
BUT NOT AN ISSUE. ALTA SHARES DOWN ABOUT 4% --
ULTA. THAT WAS THE ISSUE FOR ULTA.
ROMAINE: WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE
TREASURY MARKET, THE FLATTENING OF THE CURVE.
12 BASIS POINT DROP -- INCREASE ON THE TWO-YEAR YIELD IS
TRADERS PRICE IN SLIGHTLY GREATER ODDS THE FED WILL HIKE
RATES THIS YEAR. 30-YEAR YIELD NOT GOING
ANYWHERE AND THAT IS A TESTAMENT TO THE IDEA THAT THE
FED WILL TRY TO GET INFLATION UNDER CONTROL. TIM: REMAINE, -- ROMAINE, HOW MUCH
DOES THE AVERAGE U.S. RESIDENT EAT OF CHICKEN EACH
YEAR? ROMAINE: I DON'T KNOW. 100 POUNDS. TIM: YES.
103 POUNDS. HE DID HIS HOMEWORK. HERE'S THE IMPORTANT PART.
IT'S AN INCREASE FROM FIVE YEARS AGO, SIX POUNDS.
RED MEAT CONSUMPTION IS DECLINING ACCORDING TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. LISA GETTING THE STORY ON MY
RADAR TODAY IN THE FINANCIAL TIMES ABOUT THE CULT OF THE
FIVE DOLLAR ROTISSERIE CHICKEN THAT IS DEFINED INFLATION AT
COSTCO. ROMAINE: HOW IS EDIFYING INFLATION?
-- THAT DEFYING INFLATION? NOT GOING OUT OF BUSINESS? TIM:
THEY DO IT THEMSELVES. THEY HAVE THEIR OWN
SLAUGHTERHOUSE IN NEBRASKA. MAYBE THERE IS A STORE.
YOU KNOW, BRING IT ALL IN HOUSE. ROMAINE:
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO ONE OF THOSE PLACES IN WASHINGTON
HEIGHTS WHERE YOU CAN GET A LIVE CHICKEN AND THEY DO THE
DEED FOR YOU? TIM: NOT ON PURPOSE.
WHAT YOU GOT FOR US? ROMAINE: THE PRO BOWL.
YOU ARE A TEAM SPORTS BALL FAN, TIM STENOVEC. SINCE 1951.
THEY SAID THEY ARE GETTING RID OF IT. NOBODY WATCHES IT.
THE PLAYERS DON'T CARE. THEY DON'T WANT TO GET HURT.
IS THE EQUIVALENT OF A BACKYARD TOUCH FOOTBALL GAME.
THEY FINALLY DECIDED THE END OF AN ERA.
EMILY, ARE YOU A SPORTSMAN? EMILY: I'M TRYING. THOUGH DO -- THEY DO HAVE
APPROVAL FOR THE NFL CHEERLEADERS.
I FOLLOWED THE CHEERLEADERS. IT'S ALWAYS A FUN TIME TO SEE
ALL THE DIFFERENT CHEERLEADERS COMING TOGETHER. LISA:
CAN YOU FOLLOW COLLEGE FOOTBALL. EMILY:
I DO FOLLOW MY COLLEGE SPORTS A LOT. I NEED TO GRADUATE.
I NEED TO GROW. TIM: YOU CAN HAVE THE WEEKEND TO DO
IT. MAYBE WE WILL SEE ROMAINE ON MONDAY. MAYBE EMILY. ROMAINE:
I WILL JOIN CAROL WHEREVER SHE IS. TIM:
THAT IS IF OUR CROSS-PLATFORM COVERAGE.
HAVE A SAFE WEEKEND, EVERYBODY. SAME TIME, SAME PLACE ON MONDAY.
ROMAINE: PROCUREMENT CONTINUES ON
BLOOMBERG TELEVISION. WE GO BACK OUT TO JACKSON HOLE
FOR REACTION TO KEVIN WARSH'S SPEECH IN A SIT DOWN WITH THE
IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA COMING UP
NEXT ON BLOOMBERG. ♪ >> THE COUNTDOWN IS ON.
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW TO GET THE EDGE AT THE END OF THE
MARKET DAY. THIS IS "THE CLOSE." ROMAINE:
WELCOME BACK TO "THE CLOSE." I LOOK AT HOW EQUITIES FINISHED
OUT THE DAY. MODEST LOSSES AROUND FOR MOST
OF THE MAJOR INDICES IN THE U.S. MOST MAJOR INDICES STILL
FINISHING THE WEEK IN THE GREEN. ALL THE MAJOR INDICES NOW ON
TRACK TO POST A MONTHLY GAIN FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST. THE
REAL ACTIVITY WAS THE BOND MARKET WITH THE SHORT END OF
THE CURVE SEEING MOST OF THE ACTION.
BIG SELLING PUSHED YIELDS HIGHER BY ABOUT 12 BASIS POINTS.
LESS ACTIVITY ON THE LONGER END OF THE 30-YEAR YIELD OF ABOUT
TWO BASIS POINTS. THAT'S A FUNCTION OF WHAT WE
LEARNED OUT OF KEVIN WARSH AND HIS COMMITMENT TO FIGHT
INFLATION. MORE ARTICULATION THAT PUT A
BID UNDER FINANCIAL STOCKS LIKE BANK OF AMERICA AND A LOT OF
DISCRETIONARY STOCKS. THEY WOULD BENEFIT SHOULD
INFLATION START TO COME DOWN. THAT FIGHT AGAINST INFLATION
COULD SLOW THE ECONOMY AND THAT RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT SOME OF
THE LONGER DURATION NAMES LIKE NVIDIA AND THE MATERIAL NAMES
LIKE ALCOA. THAT BRINGS US TO OUR TOP STORY
FOR THE HOUR. IT IS NOT SO MUCH WHAT IS NEXT
FOR THE FED BUT WHAT IS NEXT FOR THE ECONOMY.
THE KEY TAKEAWAY WAS THE EXPLICIT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE
INFLATION PROBLEM AND EXPLICIT LANGUAGE THAT GETTING THE CORE
INFLATION GROWTH RATE BACK DOWN TO THE FED'S 2% TARGET IS NOT
JUST AN IDEA TO PASS OUT TO MARKETS.
IT'S A COMMITMENT BY THE OFM SEAT TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON ITS
DUAL MANDATE. -- FOMC. >> THERE IS ONE SINGLE NOBODY
CAN THIS. RESPONSIBILITY FOR 65 MONTHS OF
SUSTAINED ELEVATED INFLATION SITS SQUARELY WITH THE CENTRAL
BANK. THAT IS WHERE IT BELONGS. HERE IS MY STANDARD.
WE MUST BE CONFIDENT UNDERLYING INFLATION IS MOVING TO OUR
OBJECTIVE CLEARLY AND AT SUFFICIENT SPEED.
OTHERWISE WE HAVE WORK TO DO. THAT IS OUR JOB.
THAT IS OUR MANDATE. THAT IS OUR CHARGE TO KEEP.
ROMAINE: INFLATION IS JUST ONE SIDE OF
THE MANDATE. MAXIMUM EMPLOYMENT IS THE OTHER
END MARKETS ARE LOOKING FOR CLUES FOR THAT BALANCE, RAISING
RATES TO FIGHT INFLATION. SOMETIMES THAT SLOWS ECONOMIC
ACTIVITY WHICH MEANS A SLOWDOWN IN JOB GROWTH.
WARSH DID NOT SAY JOB LOSSES WOULD BE HARMLESS OR SPECIFY
HOW MUCH UNEMPLOYMENT HE WOULD TOLERATE.
THAT IS THE ASYMMETRIC POLICY PROBLEM HERE.
THE SILVER LINING IS THAT THE UNEMPLOYMENT OBJECT IT IS MUCH
CLOSER TO BEING SATISFIED THAN THE PRICE STABILITY MANDATE.
MAYBE THAT LABOR MARKET STRENGTH IS WHAT GIVES THE FED
ENOUGH HEADROOM TO PRIORITIZE INFLATION AND A 2% TARGET THAT
HAS REMAINED ELUSIVE FOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AND COUNTING. DANA PETERSON JOINS US, WHO IS
OUT THERE IN JACKSON HOLE, WYOMING.
I WANT YOUR REACTION TO NOT ONLY WHAT WARSH SAID BUT THE
WAY HE SAID IT. WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO
BE THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THE FED OVER THE NEXT FEW MEETINGS?
DANA: PRICE STABILITY. HE HAS SAID THAT REPEATEDLY AND
HE WAS STRONG ON THAT TODAY. I THINK THE FED IS GOING TO
CONTINUE TO KEEP RATES A LITTLE RESTRICTIVE, ESPECIALLY SINCE
WE HAVE THESE STRUCTURAL DRIVERS INFLATION LEANING
AGAINST THE EASING WE ARE SEEING FROM SHELTER COSTS.
ROMAINE: IT GETS TO THE IDEA AS WHEN
YOU WOULD SEE ACTION. A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE LOOKING AT
THE NEXT MEETING LESS THAN THREE WEEKS AWAY AND SAID THE
FED SHOULD JUST HIKE RATES. DID YOU GET ANY SENSE THAT
WARSH IS PREPARED TO ACT RATHER THAN JUST TALK? DANA: I THINK DEFINITELY HE IS
PREPARED TO ACT IF NEEDED. HE DID NOTE WE STILL HAVE SOME
INFLATIONARY NEWS COMING OUT AND THERE'S THE UNCERTAINTY
GIVEN GEOPOLITICAL RISK OUT THERE.
I THINK THE DECISION IS NOT MADE YET, AT LEAST HE NOT -- HE
CERTAINLY NOT GOING TO TELEGRAPH IT.
I THINK THE FED COULD PROBABLY REMAIN ON HOLD FOR NOW UNLESS
WE SEE INFLATION MISBEHAVING. ROMAINE:
WHAT IS YOUR VIEW AT THE CONFERENCE BOARD WHEN IT COMES
TO THE HEALTH OF THE LABOR MARKET AND HOW THAT OVERLAYS
WITH WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT AND CEO EXPECTATIONS FOR
INFLATION GOING FORWARD. DANA: I SEE LABOR MARKET IS STILL
PRETTY HEALTHY. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON NONFARM
PAYROLLS IS REALLY ELEVATED. IT GOT TO A VERY ELEVATED POINT
THE END OF 2024 AND WAS KIND OF FLAT OVER 2025 AND IN RECENT
MONTHS IT'S BEEN PICKING UP A LITTLE BIT.
THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS LOW BECAUSE THE INITIAL JOBLESS
CLAIMS ARE LOW AND CONTINUING CLAIMS HAVE BEEN LOW.
WE DON'T SEE ANY MATERIAL INFLATION IN WAGES, WHICH IS
ALSO PART OF THE LABOR MARKET. I THINK WE ARE STILL IN THIS
LOW FIRE LOW HIRE STASIS IN TERMS OF THE LABOR MARKET.
ROMAINE: WITH REGARD TO THE INFLATION
SIDE AND THE AMOUNT OF SPENDING WE CONTINUE TO SEE IN THIS
ECONOMY, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT DATA'S
TELLING US, BUT EVERY COMPANY OR CONSUMER FOCUSED COMPANY
THAT'S REPORTED EARNINGS HAS TALKED ABOUT THIS IDEA OF A
MORE CHOICE FUL CONSUMER, THESE FOLKS ARE COMING INTO BUY WHAT
THEY NEED AND NOT MUCH ELSE. ARE YOU SEEING SIMILAR PATTERNS
AND DOES THAT FORCE THE ISSUE FOR THE FED? DANA: INDEED. THAT'S BEEN THE MEASURE WE HAVE
HEARD AMONG CONSUMERS. EVEN EARLIER THAN NOW.
LATE DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR INTO THE BEGINNING OF THIS YEAR.
THEY WERE LEANING TOWARDS NECESSITIES AND AWAY FROM
DISCRETIONARY ITEMS. WE ARE SEEING THAT IN THE DATA, IN
REAL CONSUMER SPENDING, WHERE PEOPLE ARE SPENDING MORE ON
THINGS THEY NEED LIKE FOOD AND GASOLINE, ELECTRICITY, AND
MOVING AWAY FROM DISCRETIONARY GOODS ANSWER IS IS -- EVEN
THINGS LIKE CARS. WHEN IT COMES TO ENTERTAINMENT,
THEY ARE TRADING DENTIST -- TRADING DOWN TO STREAMING FROM
GOING TO THE MOVIES. WHAT CONSUMERS ARE SIGNALING IS
DEFINITELY SHOWING UP IN THE DATA NOW. ROMAINE:
AS JACKSON HALL GETS UNDERWAY, THE PUBLIC SPEECH, HE GAVE THE
MARKET WHAT THEY WANTED NOW, HE GOES
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, THE TASK FORCES COME ALL THIS OTHER
STUFF, WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT FOR YOU COMING OUT OF THESE
MEETINGS, INDEPENDENT OF THE DUAL MANDATE SPEECH TODAY? DANA:
THINK IT IS THAT PROMISE THAT THE FED AS A COMMITTEE WILL DO
WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE ECONOMY. AND SHOULD IT BE THE CASE THAT
INFLATION DOES PICK UP AGAIN AND IT DISCONTINUES ITS
DECELERATION, THEY WILL HIKE. I THINK THERE IS PLENTY OF ROOM
TO JUST REMAIN ON HOLD. ESPECIALLY SINCE WE CONSUMER
SPENDING SLOW, AS AS WELL AS PIVOTING TOWARDS THOSE THINGS
THAT PEOPLE NEED AND MOST OF THE GROWTH OF THE ECONOMY THIS
YEAR HAS BEEN DUE TO INVESTMENT IN TECH, ESPECIALLY A.I.
AND THERE'S NO GUARANTEE THAT WILL PERSIST AT THE RELATIVE
STRENGTH WE HAVE SEEN SO FAR. SO THERE'S AN ARGUMENT FOR
HOLDING AND WAITING AND SEEING. ROMAINE:
REALLY -- REALLY APPRECIATE YOU JOINING US, THE CHIEF
ECONOMIST, LEADER OF THE ECONOMY STRATEGIST AND FINANCE
CENTER OVER AT THE CONFERENCE BOARD.
WHEN WE COME BACK, WE WILL FOCUS ON FINANCIAL REGULATION.
THERE'S A LOT GOING ON IN WASHINGTON.
WE WILL CATCH UP WITH THE FORMER SEC COMMISSIONER MIKE
PIWOWAR. WE WILL HAVE THAT CONVERSATION
WHEN WE COME BACK AFTER THE BREAK RIGHT HERE ON "THE CLOSE"
ON BLOOMBERG. ♪ ROMAINE:
AS KEVIN WARSH AND OTHERS GO BEHIND CLOSED DOORS TO DISCUSS
MONETARY POLICY FRAMEWORKS, THERE ARE DEBATES IN WASHINGTON
ON THE LINES IN AMERICAN INVESTING AND WHETHER THEY
SHOULD BE REDRAWN. THE SEC IS CONSIDERING CHANGES
AND REGULATORS LOOKING TO PUT MORE PRIVATE ASSETS INTO MARKET
EXCHANGES, EXPERIMENTING WITH TOKENIZATION. MICHAEL PIWOWAR HAS BEEN STEEPED INTO THIS FOR DECADES. .
I DO WANT TO START OFF WITH KEVIN WARSH.
IN THAT SPEECH AT JACKSON HOLE, HE TALKED ABOUT THE IDEA THAT
MOVING INTEREST RATES IS THE PREDOMINANT TOOL FOR THE FED TO
FULFILL ITS MANDATE. HE SEEMED TO NOT KNOCK BUT
THROUGH SHADE AT THE IDEA OF UNCONVENTIONAL MECHANISMS WHEN
TIMES ARE UNCONVENTIONAL. YOU WERE ADVISOR DURING ONE OF
THE MOST UNCONVENTIONAL TIMES IN HISTORY DURING THE FINANCIAL
CRISIS. I'M CURIOUS TO SEE WHAT YOU
THINK OF THAT COMMENTS PARTICULARLY GIVEN JUST A WEEK
AND A HALF AGO TREASURY SECRETARY WAS MAKING IT CLEAR
HE WAS READY TO USE UNCONVENTIONAL TACTICS TO KEEP
RATES DOWN. MICHAEL: THANKS FOR HAVING ME.
IT IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT KEVIN WARSH HAS SAID IN HIS
NOMINATION HEARING AND THE PRESS CONFERENCES HE'S HAD
AFTER THE FOMC MEETINGS. HE REALLY WANTS TO FOCUS
UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY AND MOVE AWAY FROM THE LINES
THAT ARE BLURRING IN FISCAL POLICY AND HE HAS EVEN GOTTEN
TO THE POINT WHERE HE SAID EARLIER, OWNING A BUNCH OF
LONG-TERM BONDS ON THE FED BALANCE SHEET IS BLURRING THE
LINES OF FISCAL POLICY, SO HE IS LOOKING TO SHED THOSE FROM
THE BALANCE SHEET RATHER THAN FOLLOWING THE TREASURY
SECRETARY INTO INTERBREEDING IN THE MARKETS AND HE MADE THAT --
INTERVENING IN THE MARKETS AND HE MADE THAT CLEAR TODAY.
UNFILTERED MARKET PRICES ARE IMPORTANT FOR THE FED TO
FULFILL ITS MANDATE AND HE CAME UP WITH AN ANALOGY THAT BEN
BERNANKE ABOUT YEARS AGO WHERE YOU
HAVE -- IF THE FED IS LOOKING TO MARKET PRICES BUT THE MARKET
IS LOOKING TO FOR GUIDANCE, YOU CAN END UP WITH A HALL OF
MIRRORS PROBLEM. WHAT HE WANTS IS UNFILTERED
MARKET PRICES IN THE BOND MARKET S AND DOES NOT WANT TO
TRY TO MANIPULATE THAT AND HAVE MARKETS FIGURE OUT WHAT THE FED
IS GOING AFTER THAT. ROMAINE: HE WILL HAVE TO RECONCILE THAT
WITH HIS COLLEAGUE AT SOME POINT. YOU ARE GETTING OUT WHAT WAS
KIND OF ADMONISHING HIS FORMER PRODIGY AND HE MADE THE EXACT
SAME POINT, CANNOT REMEMBER THE LANGUAGE BUT IT WAS BASICALLY
LIKE ONE OF THE PUREST FORMS OF KNOWING WHERE THINGS ARE GOING,
LETTING THE TREASURY MARKET DO WHAT IT NEEDS TO DO AND YOU
WILL GET THE MESSAGE. WARSH SEEMS TO BE INTENT ON
ALLOWING FOR THAT BUT HE ALSO MADE IT CLEAR HE DOESN'T WANT
THE MARKET TO DO THE WORK FOR THE FED, HE THINKS IT HAS A
RESPONSIBILITY TO FIGHT INFLATION ON ITS OWN, DO YOU
THINK YOU WILL DO THAT? MICHAEL: YES, HE MADE IT CLEAR, PEOPLE
WERE LOOKING -- HE SAID HE WOULD NOT GIVE FORWARD THAT IS
AN ADDRESS THAT RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING.
AND FOLKS WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT, THE BIGGEST QUESTION
PEOPLE ASK GOING INTO THE MEETING I HEARD WAS, AT LEAST
GIVE US YOUR REACTION FUNCTION. IN THE SENSE THAT PEOPLE WANTED
INSIGHT INTO WHAT DATA WE ARE USING AND HOW ARE YOU REACTING
TO THAT DATA IN TERMS OF MONETARY POLICY? YOU PRETTY MUCH ANSWERED -- HE
PRETTY MUCH ANSWERED THE FIRST PART OF THE QUESTION WITH THE
DATA HE'S LOOKING AT. HE SPENT THE FIRST PART OF HIS
SPEECH SAYING HE'S ACTUALLY LOOKING AT NEW DATA INVOLVING
THE EFFECTS OF A.I. FOR THE SECOND PART HOW HE IS
REACTING TO THAT, HE DID NOT GIVE AN EXPLICIT ANSWER.
HE LAID OUT CORE PRINCIPLES HE IS THINKING ABOUT. ONE OF THOSE, HE STATED THAT
THE 2% INFLATION TARGET IS FIRM AND FIXED AND HE MENTIONED THE
PCE INDEX. THERE WERE QUESTIONS AS TO WHAT
INDEX HE WOULD BE LOOKING AT AND WHETHER THE 2% WAS
SOMETHING HE WOULD BE TARGETING OR HE WOULD BE SATISFIED WITH
SOMETHING SLIGHTLY ABOVE 2%, WE HAVE BEEN STUCK IN THE 3% OR 4%
RANGE IN A WHILE -- HE SAID I AM LOOKING AT 2 $ -- 2% AND
BASICALLY LAID DOWN THE LINE, HOLDING HIMSELF ACCOUNTABLE TO
THAT. ROMAINE: GIVEN YOUR HISTORY, JUST ABOUT
HOW TRANSPARENT THE MARKETS ARE TO BE USED AS A RELIABLE
INDICATOR, YOUR RESEARCH BACK IN THE DAY LED US TO TRACE MORE
TRANSPARENCY AND BOND MARKETS, AND THAT SEEMED TO BE THE MOVE.
BUT NOW IT IS PREDICTION MARKETS AND ORGANIZATION AND
THESE FINANCIAL INNOVATIONS THAT COME IN, THERE'S CONCERNS
THAT NOW WE ARE GOING BACK TO MAY BE A LITTLE BIT MORE
OPACITY IN THE MARKETS. HOW DO YOU SEE IT? MICHAEL: THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN CONCERNS
WHERE THE FED HAS BEEN INVOLVED. YOU MENTIONED THE FINANCIAL
CRISIS. THE FED HAD BEEN BUYING MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES.
SO PRICES IN THE MORTGAGE MARKET WERE ARTIFICIAL FOR A
LONG TIME. NOW THE FED IS GETTING OUT OF
THAT AND WE ARE STARTING TO SEE WHAT THE EXACT MARKETS ARE. IN TERMS OF PREDICTION MARKETS,
THERE'S ACADEMIC EVIDENCE THEY'RE PROVIDING MORE
TRANSPARENCY AND MORE INFORMATION TO FOLKS, NOT ONLY
RETAIL INVESTORS INVESTING -- THE RETAIL
TRADERS AS A HOBBY, BUT WE ARE ACTUALLY SEEING THE
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS BECOMING MORE INTERESTED IN
PREDICTION MARKETS. FIRST IN PRICE DISCOVERY.
IF YOU WANT TO LOOK AT, WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY OF THE FED
INCREASING RATES BY 25 BASIS POINTS AT THE SEPTEMBER
MEETING, THE ODDS WENT FROM ONE IN THREE BEFORE TODAY'S SPEECH
TO ABOUT 50-50 AFTERWARDS AND IT MATCHES PRETTY MUCH WHAT WE
ARE SEEING IN THE FUTURES MARKET.
THEY PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CONTRACTS THAT MATCH WHAT WE
ALREADY HAVE OR CAN ACTUALLY GET NEW MARKETS TO BE ABLE TO
HEDGE IN THESE MARKETS. ROMAINE:
WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THAT KEYNOTE SPEECH BY KEVIN WARSH
AT THE KANSAS CITY SYMPOSIUM AT JACKSON HOLE, WYOMING.
LISA ABRAMOWICZ IS STILL ON THE GROUND AND HAS A SPECIAL
INTERVIEW SIT DOWN WITH THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE IMF,
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA. LISA: AND WITH THE IMF MANAGING
DIRECTOR KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA AFTER A MOMENTOUS SPEECH FROM
FED CHAIR KEVIN WARSH. THIS IS YOUR FIRST JACKSON HOLE
SUMMIT. I WOULD LOVE TO SAY THANK YOU
FOR JOINING US. WHAT WAS YOUR TAKE AWAY FROM
KEVIN WARSH SPEECH? KRISTALINA: HE DID A GREAT JOB.
HE ARTICULATED HIS VIEWS ON THE RAPIDLY CHANGING WORLD.
VERY CLEARLY. HIS COMMITMENT TO PRICE
STABILITY, THAT 2% IS THE TARGET FOR THE FED TO ACHIEVE
WAS VERY CLEAR. I THINK THE AUDIENCE WAS
POSITIVELY IMPRESSED BY THE CLARITY AND ALSO THE MESSAGE HE
COMMUNICATED TO THE CENTRAL BANK COMMUNITY.
WE HAVE TO BE HUMBLE. THE WORLD IS CHANGING SO
RAPIDLY. WE HAVE TO CAREFULLY WATCH WHAT
IS GOING ON AND MAKE OUR BEST CALL FOR THE BENEFIT OF PEOPLE,
FOR THE BENEFITS OF THE ECONOMY. LISA:
YOU HAD A SPEECH LATER IN THE MORNING YOU WROTE THAT THE
CENTRAL BANK ROLE IS TO MAKE SURE INFLATION STAYS LOW AND
STABLE. HOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE PAST
5 -- MORE THAN FIVE YEARS WHERE INFLATION HAS BEEN ABOUT TARGET?
IS THIS THE FAULT OF CENTRAL BANKERS?
IS THIS SOMETHING ELSE WE CAN ADDRESS? KRISTALINA:
WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS SHOCK UPON STOCK UP ON STOCK.
OPPRESSED GOVERNMENTS -- THEY HAVE PRESSED GOVERNMENT TO
BORROW AND SPEND MORE THAN THEY SHOULD. OF COURSE, THAT HAS SOME
INFLATIONARY IMPACT. ALSO WE KNOW THAT WHEN WE WERE
HIT BY COVID, AT THAT TIME THE PUBLIC SPENDING WAS PERHAPS A
BIT MORE GENEROUS. HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH IS
ENOUGH WHEN THE WORLD ECONOMY COMES TO A SCREECHING STOP?
I WOULD BLAME CENTRAL BANKS ONLY IF THEY DON'T LEARN
LESSONS FROM EXPERIENCE. WHAT WE ARE SEEING HERE IN
JACKSON HOLE AND WHAT WE HEARD FROM CHAIR WARSH'S THEY ARE
DRAWING LESSONS FROM EXPERIENCE. LISA:
A LESSON ON ITS FACE SEEMS TO BE PERHAPS I NEED TO BE A BIT
MORE RESTRICTIVE IN THEIR POLICIES.
DO YOU THINK MORE BROADLY AROUND THE WORLD THAT NEEDS TO
BE THE APPROACH, EVEN THOUGH SHOCKS ARE STILL COMING?
KRISTALINA: WE HAVE TO ACCEPT THIS REALITY
THAT THE WORLD IS CHANGING RAPIDLY AND THAT PART OF THE
CHANGE IS A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE SHOCK.
RIGHT NOW WE ARE DEALING WITH TWO SHOCKS WORKING IN OPPOSITE
DIRECTIONS. WE HAVE THE ENERGY SUPPLY SHOCK
AND WE HAVE AI. ONE DRAGS GROWTH DOWN IN ONE
PUSHES IT UP. WE HAVE TO GET ACCUSTOMED TO AN
ENVIRONMENT THAT IS LESS PREDICTABLE.
WHAT DO YOU DO IN THAT ENVIRONMENT WHEN FIRST, BUILD
YOUR BUFFERS IN GOOD TIMES. THE ECONOMY IS DOING WELL.
LET'S CUT THE DEFICIT, BRING DOWN THE DEBT. TWO, RECOGNIZE YOUR BEST
FRIENDS ARE SOUND POLICIES AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS. LISA:
DO YOU FEEL LIKE YOU ARE BEATING YOUR HEAD AGAINST THE
WALL WHEN YOU SAY GET YOUR HOUSE IN ORDER TO PEOPLE SAYING
NO THANKS, MAYBE THE NEXT GUY CAN DO IT?
IT SEEMS LIKE NO ONE IS LISTENING. KRISTALINA:
SUMMER LISTENING. LOOK AT EMERGING MARKETS.
THEY HAVE DONE FABULOUSLY WELL. THE FRAMEWORKS ARE STRONG.
THEIR FISCAL FRAMEWORKS ARE MUCH BETTER SOMETIMES.
THEY DO BETTER THAN BIG ECONOMIES.
SOME PEOPLE THAT HAVE HAD THE PAINFUL EXPERIENCE OF CRISES
ARE LISTENING. IT IS HUMAN NATURE.
WHEN DO WE FIX OUR ROOFS? WHEN THE SUN IS SHINING OR WHEN
THERE IS RAIN? WE WILL CONTINUE TO SHOUT THE
SUN IS SHINING, IT'S A GOOD TIME, BRING THE ROOFERS. LISA: KEN ROGOFF WAS TALKING WITH TOM
KEENE AND HE SAID IT'S GOING TO TAKE A DEBT CRISIS TO REALLY
CAUSE DEVELOPED MARKETS TO REALLY CAUSE DEVELOPED MARKETS
GET THEIR FISCAL HOUSE IN ORDER. DO YOU AGREE? KRISTALINA:
NOT NECESSARILY. WE HAVE SEEN HISTORICALLY THAT
ACTIONS HAVE BEEN TAKEN IN GOOD ECONOMIC TIMES. SOUND GROWTH, GOOD HOUSEHOLD
SPENDING, INVESTMENTS, AND THEN ADJUSTMENTS, FISCAL ADJUSTMENTS
TAKE PLACE. BUT WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT
WE LIVE IN A WORLD OF POPULAR DESIRE FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO
SPEND MORE. WHY? THE GOVERNMENT HAS DONE IT OVER
THE LAST COUPLE OF CRISIS. THEY DID IT AFTER COVID, AFTER
THE ENTER SHOCK FROM THE WAR IN UKRAINE, THE STOCK PRICE AT
THAT TIME. PEOPLE SAY YOU DID IT. CONTINUE.
NOT AFFORDABLE. MY MESSAGE TO EVERYBODY IS,
DELAYED NO LONGER. WHY? THE LEVELS ARE NOW ABOVE WHERE
THEY WERE AFTER THE SECOND WORLD WAR. KEN IS RIGHT TO SAY, DO YOU
REALLY WANT A CRISIS TO GET YOU TO DO WHAT IS NECESSARY?
PLEASE ACT ON YOUR OWN. ROMAINE:
IT SOUNDS LIKE THE KID WHO GOT CANDY AFTER EVERYTHING THEY
HAVE DONE. YOU SAID IN YOUR SPEECH THAT
IMF POPULARLY STANDS FOR ITS MOSTLY FISCAL.
INTERESTING POINT AT A CONFERENCE.
HOW HAS THE FISCAL DEBT OVERHANG COMPLICATED MONETARY
POLICY AND MADE IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR POLICYMAKERS TO
REALLY ADDRESS INFLATION HAD ON? -- HEAD ON? KRISTALINA: MORE DEMAND AND MORE SPENDING
PUSHES PRICE LEVELS UP, NOT DOWN.
SECOND, WHEN WE HAVE A HIGH LEVEL OF DEBT IT IS MUCH HARDER
FOR CENTRAL BANKS TO ACT DECISIVELY BY RAISING INTEREST
RATES. WHY? THE COST OF SERVING THE DEBT IS
GOING TO GO UP. THE FED HERE, THE DUAL MANDATE,
PRICE STABILITY AND EMPLOYMENT. WE DON'T WANT TO UNDERMINE
THESE STRONG PERFORMERS OF THE ECONOMY.
THAT IS WHY THEIR JOB IS HARDER, BUT IT IS THEIR JOB.
THEY HAVE AND FOREMOST THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRICE
STABILITY. LISA: ANOTHER ASPECT OF THE
CONFERENCE HAS BEEN STABLECOIN. NO ONE WANTS TO TALK ABOUT
STABLECOIN. WE ARE HERE TO TALK ABOUT
SOMETHING ELSE AND IT IS NOT THE QUESTION OF HOW WE WILL
HAVE DIGITAL ASSETS. THAT SAID, YOU MADE AN
INTERESTING POINT ABOUT THE ROLE TECHNOLOGY PLAYS IN
FINANCIAL STABILITY AND HOW IT COULD ACTUALLY EXPEDITE OR
HASTEN CRISES STEMMING FROM MONETARY POLICY ASSETS OR
FISCAL POLICY. CAN YOU TALK ABOUT THAT?
KRISTALINA: FINANCIAL INNOVATION IS GOOD
BUT IT DECREASES RISKS. IT ACCELERATES IMPACT.
THE IMPACT IS POSITIVE, GREAT. IF IT IS NEGATIVE, IT CAN LEAD TO SPILLOVER IMPACTS WITH AN
ECONOMY -- WITHIN AN ECONOMY AND ACROSS ITS BORDERS.
MY MESSAGE IS DON'T LIVE WITH THE ILLUSION THAT TECHNOLOGY IS
GOING TO MAKE YOUR LIFE SIMPLER. IT WON'T. YOU NEED STRONG POLICY
FRAMEWORKS, EVEN MORE SO IN A WORLD OF FAST IMPACT FROM
TECHNOLOGY. MORE, NOT LESS. LISA:
I'M SMILING BECAUSE I DON'T THINK ANYONE HAS THOUGHT
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAS MADE THEIR LIVES THAT MUCH
EASIER. DO YOU THINK THE POTENTIAL
ISSUE THAT COULD CAUSE SYSTEMIC EVENTS IS INFLATION AND
POTENTIALLY INFLATION GETTING A BIT OUT OF CONTROL AND FORCING
THE HAND OF CENTRAL BANKS MORE AGGRESSIVELY? KRISTALINA: THE GOOD NEWS IS INFLATION
EXPECTATIONS ARE STILL WELL ANCHORED.
WE HAVE HAD STUBBORN INFLATION. IT IS SOMETHING THAT CENTRAL
BANKS OUGHT TO PAY ATTENTION TO AND TAKE ACTION IF NECESSARY.
IT WAS VERY REASSURING TO HEAR CHAIR WARSH SAYING THAT.
IF NECESSARY, WE ACT. BUT WE ARE NOT SEEING THE
UNDERLYING TREND TO BE ONE THAT CREATES FEARS THAT
INFLATION IS GETTING OUT OF WHACK. IT IS NOT HAPPENING. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO ACT
DECISIVELY EARLY? BECAUSE OF INFLATION
EXPECTATIONS WERE TO DE-ANCHOR, BUT WHAT HAPPENED IN MARKETS IS
OF COURSE NERVOUSNESS LEADING TO PANIC.
WE DON'T WANT THAT TO HAPPEN. LISA: DO YOU THINK THERE IS A
CREDIBILITY ISSUE RIGHT NOW GIVEN THE CONCERNS WITH THE
FISCAL OVERHANG AND SOME OF THE FEARS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN RELUCTANT TO ADDRESS INFLATION/
? TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THEY ARE DEALING WITH. KRISTALINA:
THEY NEED TO BE LASER FOCUSED ON TRUST IN THEIR ABILITY TO
CONTAIN INFLATION. IN THAT SENSE THE MESSAGE TO
CENTRAL BANKS IS IF YOU NEED TO ACT, DO NOT HESITATE. HESITATION CREATES CONCERNS.
LET'S BE FAIR TO CENTRAL BANKS. THEY HAVE SUSTAINED
INDEPENDENCE AND DECISION-MAKING.
THE ACT ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE U.S. ECONOMY, GROWTH IS STRONG,
UNEMPLOYMENT IS LOW, PRODUCTIVITY IS AMAZING.
2.5% GROWTH YEAR AFTER YEAR. SO THE REAL ECONOMY IS DOING
WELL. IT IS INFLATION THAT IS THE
HEADACHE. LISA: SOMETHING YOU HAVE NOTED AND
OTHER PEOPLE TOO IS EVERYONE IS SURPRISED AT HOW RESILIENT THE
GLOBAL ECONOMY HAS BEEN IN THE FACE OF THE OIL CRISIS, NOT TO
MENTION THE UNDERLYING ECONOMY. DO YOU EXPECT THAT TO KEEP
GOING? IS THAT RESILIENCE WELL-FOUNDED
OR IS THAT FRAGILE AND BIFURCATED IN A WAY TO GIVE YOU
PAUSE? KRISTALINA: SO FAR THE RESILIENCE HAS BEEN
STRONG. THAT RESILIENCE CANNOT BE TAKEN
FOR GRANTED. WHY IS IT RESILIENT?
THE TWO FORCES, AI BOOSTING IT UP AND NOT A STRONG IMPACT OF
ENERGY PRICES AS WE FEARED. THERE WAS TALK ABOUT OIL PRICES
AT $150. THAT DID NOT HAPPEN. IT DID NOT HAPPEN BECAUSE
RESERVES CAN BE DEPLOYED BECAUSE OTHER SOURCES OF
ENERGY, THE UNITED STATES, STEPPED UP.
THE SHIFT TO ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IS QUITE PROFOUND AND ALSO
BECAUSE WE ARE MORE SENSITIVE TO PRICE THAN WE THOUGHT WE
WOULD BE. THE MAN WENT DOWN. -- DEMAND WENT DOWN.
SUPPLIES, RESERVES, THIS IS NOT FOREVER. IF WE SEE ENERGY PRICES
CLIMBING UP, THEY WOULD COMPLICATE THE INFLATION STORY.
THAT IS SOMETHING THAT OF COURSE WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT.
LISA: DO YOU THINK THERE IS RISK THE
DOLLAR CAN BE UNDERMINED -- IT COULD BE UNDERMINED AS THE
RESERVE CURRENCY? DO YOU THINK THAT HAS BEEN PUT
TO REST? KRISTALINA: WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE?
WHEN YOU LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING, AND THAT IS THE
SUBJECT OF THIS SYMPOSIUM, WHERE IS FINANCIAL INNOVATION
TAKING US? STABLECOINS. WHO IS BACKING STABLECOINS?
THE UNITED STATES. 90% OF STABLECOINS ORIGINATE
FROM HERE. -- 98%. HOW IS THAT BEING DONE?
WITH TREASURY'S BACKING. THERE IS NO CLEAR MARCH TOWARDS
AN ALTERNATIVE. LET ME SAY SOMETHING THAT I
WISH PEOPLE WOULD PAY MORE ATTENTION TO.
WHAT IS THE STRENGTH OF THE DOLLAR?
IT IS THE STRENGTH OF THE U.S. ECONOMY. THE U.S.
ECONOMY WITH DEEP LIQUID CAPITAL MARKETS.
A LOT OF INVESTMENT IN VENTURE CAPITAL AND INNOVATION,
ATTRACTIVENESS. THEY DID COME HERE.
THEY DON'T GO SOMEWHERE ELSE. THIS UNDERPINS THE STRENGTH OF
THE DOLLAR. THIS SAID, WE WOULD STILL BE
ADVOCATING FOR RESPONSIBLE FISCAL POLICY HERE IN THE
UNITED STATES AND ELSEWHERE. LISA:
MANAGING DIRECTOR KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA, REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE IMF AND I WILL
SEND IT BACK TO YOU. ROMAINE: LISA HAS DONE A LOT OF GREAT
WORK IN JACKSON HOLE, WYOMING. WE KEEP THE CONVERSATION GOING.
LET'S BRING IN RIGHT NOW FORMER FDIC CHAIR AND SENIOR FELLOW AT
THE CENTER FOR FINANCIAL STABILITY SHEILA BAIR. THE LAST TIME WE SPOKE, IT WAS
THE FIRST FED CHAIR MEETING IN JUNE. YOU GAVE HIM AN A PLUS FOR
HANDLING THE PRESS CONFERENCE. DID YOU LISTEN TO THE SPEECH
TODAY? SHEILA: I WILL GIVE IT AND SHEILA: I WOULD GIVE IT AND A -- AN A . IT'S A FACTOR ON WHAT'S GOING
ON WITH INFLATION. HE DID WHAT HE NEEDED TO DO.
THERE IS A LOT OF SUBSTANCE. TALKED ABOUT THE ECONOMY.
SHARED PERSONAL PERSPECTIVES. EXPLAINED THE LAST MEETING
DECISION TO HOLD. IT WAS, YOU KNOW, TWEAKED A BIT ON THE HAWKISH SIDE BUT HE WAS
GENERAL. HE WANTS CONVINCING EVIDENCE,
MEANINGFUL EVIDENCE THAT INFLATION IS COMING DOWN.
THE BIG QUESTION IS WHAT THE TRENDS ARE.
I THINK IT IS REFRESHING. THE FED OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW,
HINDSIGHT IS ALWAYS 20/20 BUT THEY WERE TOO EAGER TO SEE
CUTTING INFLATION AND STARTED CUTTING TOO EARLY AND WE HAD A
PROBLEM. THEY WANT TO SEE CLEAR EVIDENCE
BASED ON THAT AND MY GUESS IS HE IS GOING TO BE RAISING
RATES, IF NOT IN SEPTEMBER, IN OCTOBER. ROMAINE:
HE WAS SORT OF GIVING HIMSELF A LITTLE BIT OF WIGGLE ROOM TO
MAYBE GET OUT OF THAT SHOULD THINGS CHANGE.
BUT I WANT TO BE CLEAR, TOO,AS HE TALKED ABOUT THIS PERSISTENT
INFLATION, HE DID NOT THINK BROAD FINANCIAL CONDITIONS ARE
RESTRICTIVE AND HE TALKED ABOUT HOW REAL CONSUMER SPENDING
DESPITE THESE STOCKS IS STILL INCREASING.
HE PAINTED A PICTURE OF A RELATIVELY HEALTHY ECONOMY. AND TO BUILD UP -- TO BUILD
OFF SOMETHING, YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO FIX YOUR ROOF WHEN THE SUN
IS SHINING, NOT RAINING. IF YOU HAVE A HEALTHY ECONOMY,
YOU KNOW INFLATION IS RUNNING HOT, AS IT HAS FOR 65 MONTHS,
WHY NOT DO SOMETHING NOW? SHEILA:
I THINK THAT IS EVENTUALLY AGAIN -- UNLESS THE NUMBERS
SHOW A SOMETHING DIFFERENTLY -- SHOW US SOMETHING DIFFERENTLY,
FINANCIAL CONDITIONS ARE NOT RESTRICTIVE AND MANY SECTORS
ARE PRETTY LOOSE AND I AM ALWAYS SCRATCHING MY HEAD
ON GETTING YOUR LENDING INTO THE ECONOMY WHICH WOULD ALSO BE
INFLATIONARY -- NEW LENDING INTO THE ECONOMY WHICH WOULD
ALSO BE INFLATIONARY. THE FED DOES NOT LOOK AT THE
SUPERVISORY OR REGULATORY SIDE OF WHAT THEY DO.
HE HAS ROOM TO TIGHTEN WITHOUT HURTING THE ECONOMY.
AND YOU ARE RIGHT. [LAUGHTER] THAT'S WHEN YOU WANT TO DO IT,
WHEN YOU'VE GOT THE FLEXIBILITY AND BANDWIDTH TO DO IT. ROMAINE:
LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT BANKS AND THE INTEREST RATE CYCLE HERE,
WE ARE COMING OFF ONE OF THE MOST PROFITABLE QUARTERS IN
LARGER BANKS I SHOULD POINT OUT, DO YOU SEE THE BANKING
SECTOR HIM AS STRONG -- PARTICULARLY STRONG ENOUGH TO WITHSTAND IF IT DOES GET THERE,
A FULL FIGHT AGAINST INFLATION WITH REGARDS TO RATES? SHEILA:
AGAIN , WE HAVE WEAKENING LIQUIDITY
RULES BUT I THINK THEY ARE FINE. HIGHER RATES IN MANY WAYS HELPS
THEM, DOESN'T HURT THEM. THEY HAVE LONGER-TERM
SECURITIES WITH LOWER YIELDS. THAT WAS A PROBLEM AT THE
REGIONAL BANKS -- THAT THE REGIONAL BANKS GOT INTO IN 2023.
I DON'T SEE THAT KIND OF RAPID HIKE TAKING PLACE.
I MAY BE WRONG. I THINK THE BANKS -- I WOULDN'T
NOT WORRY ABOUT THE BANKS IN A RISING INTEREST RATE
ENVIRONMENT. I WOULD WORRY THE FED HAVING TO
RAISE INTEREST RATES WHEN WE ARE SEEING THE ECONOMY SLOW AND
FOUND EMPLOYMENT GO UP, THAT WOULD CREATE A PROBLEM.
BUT HOPEFULLY HE CAN AVOID THAT. IT IS ANOTHER REASON WHY
PROBABLY NO TIME LIKE THE PRESIDENT -- LIKE THE PRESENT .
ROMAINE: HOW WE SORT OF RESOLVED OR AT
LEAST ADDRESSED TO A CERTAIN EXTENT SOME OF THE DURATION
RISK THAT WAS OUT THERE THAT TOOK DOWN SILICON BANK A COUPLE
OF YEARS AGO? BECAUSE THAT IS STILL A CONCERN.
I SHOULD POINT OUT FOR ALL THE PROFITS THE BANKS REPORTED,
THEY ARE STILL SITTING ON HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS
IN UNREALIZED LOSSES THAT WILL HAVE TO BE RECONCILED AT SOME
POINT. SHEILA: THAT IS TRUE. AND THE CAPITAL TREATMENT
LONG-TERM WILL BE HELPFUL. I THINK BANKS DO NOT HAVE TO
WORK TO MARKET. THEY HAVE FLEXIBILITIES OTHER
COMPANIES WOULD NOT HAVE ON THIS.
SO, I THINK THEY WILL WHETHER IT -- WEATHER IT. I THINK THE 2023 KERFUFFLE WITH
THE REGIONAL BANKS WOKE UP BANK MANAGERS AND EXAMINERS, TOO.
THERE'S A LOT OF SCRUTINY ON UNREALIZED LOSSES AND A LOT OF
BEHIND THE SCENES AND PROVIDES REACTIONS TO MAKE SURE THEY CAN
WITHSTAND LOSSES, DEPENDING ON WHAT
HAPPENS WITH INTEREST RATES, STRENGTHENING RISK MANAGEMENT
COULD BE BETTER. BUT THESE MINI CRISES SOMETIMES
HAVE POSITIVE IMPACTS. THEY WAKE PEOPLE UP, THIS IS A
PROBLEM, WE NEED TO GET IT FIXED, AND THAT IS WHAT
HAPPENED AFTER '23. ROMAINE: ARE REGULATORS FORGETTING THE
LESSONS OF '08? YOU MENTION THE LOWER CAPITAL
REQUIREMENTS THE BANKS HAVE BEEN PUSHING FOR, THE ARGUMENT
IS WE ARE PUMPING MONEY AND LENDING MORE INTO THE SYSTEM IF
YOU ALLOW US TO DO THIS. IS THERE A BALANCE TO THAT
ARGUMENT? SHEILA: WHY WOULD WE WANT MORE LENDING?
[LAUGHTER] THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF CREDIT.
THEY HAD THIS ADDITIONAL BALANCE SHEET CAPACITY.
THEY WILL PROBABLY JUST DO BUYBACKS. [LAUGHTER]
BUT ASSUMING THEY DO, THEY HAVE TO FIND BORROWERS.
AND THEY WILL BE RISKIER BORROWERS BECAUSE PRETTY MUCH
ANYBODY THAT JUST SERVES A LOAN OUT IS GIVING ONE.
I THINK THERE'S SO MUCH GOING ON FRANKLY THAT IS BEYOND THE
CONTROL OF THE FED THAT IS CREATING INFLATIONARY PRESSURES
WHICH IS WHY I AM NOT OPTIMISTIC HE IS GOING TO SEE A
TRAJECTORY ON INFLATION. BUT, NO, THERE'S PLENTY OF
CREDIT OUT THERE ALREADY AND THEY ARE MAKING PLENTY OF
LOANS, THEY DON'T NEED MORE CAPITAL CAPACITY TO DO SO.
ROMAINE: WITH REGARD TO THE FED'S FOCUS
OR LACK THEREOF ON THE REGULATORY STUFF, A LOT OF
PEOPLE HATE THE DOT PLOT BUT THE ONLY THING THEY HATE MORE
ARE STRESS TESTS. [LAUGHTER] I AM CURIOUS -- I DON'T KNOW,
THEY FORCE US TO COVER IT, I DON'T THINK I'VE EVER LEARNED
ANYTHING. BUT YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS.
DO THESE FED STRESS TESTS TELL US ANYTHING USEFUL? SHEILA: NO.
I WROTE A PIECE FOR THIS A WHILE BACK.
I THINK THEY NEED TO BE -- YOU NEED TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF
STRESS TESTING PROCESS TO MAKE SURE THAT BANKS ARE PREPARED TO
WITHSTAND SHOCKS ENOUGH. BUT THE NATURE OF THE SHOCKS,
THE RISK CHANGES HAVE TO BE A DYNAMIC PROCESS AND THEY KEEP
STRESSING ANY TYPE OF SCENARIO AND THEY NEVER STRESSED THE
STAGFLATION SCENARIO AND OTHER RISKS THEY NEED TO BE FOCUSED
ON. SO IT IS NOT ONLY A HUGE
DISTRACTION FOR THE SUPERVISORS AND THE BANK MANAGEMENT, IT
CREATES A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY.
THEY ALWAYS PASS NOW -- OH, EVERYTHING MUST BE FINE.
JAMIE DIMON HAD A TELLING COMMENT THAT IT INHIBITS BANK
BOARDS FROM CHALLENGING RISK MANAGERS BECAUSE, THE FED SAYS
WE ARE GREAT, DID YOU SEE THE STRESS TEST RESULTS?
WHEN MAYBE THEY AREN'T. THEY NEED TO GO.
WE NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH A DYNAMIC PROCESS.
NOT TIED TO CAPITAL. AND WHICH MAKES IT INHERENTLY
CONTENTIOUS. SO I THINK MY GUESS IS KEVIN
WARSH WILL BE DEALING WITH IT AND THEY WILL MAKE SIGNIFICANT
CHANGES. ROMAINE: ALWAYS A PLEASURE, HAVE A
WONDERFUL WE, FORMER FCIC CHAIR, SHEILA BAIR.
IF YOU HAVEN'T READ "GRAB THE BULL BY THE HORNS,"
CHECK IT OUT. WE WILL BE BACK WITH WHAT TO
SET YOU UP WITH NEXT WEEK. THIS IS BLOOMBERG. ♪ ROMAINE:
JUST A PROGRAMMING NOTE, "THE CLOSE" WILL BE ON THE ROAD NEXT
MONDAY, WE WILL BE LIVE FROM BALTIMORE, MARYLAND.
WE WILL CATCH UP WITH CIOS AND HAD ECONOMISTS THERE AND
ROB SHARP, THE CEO OF T. ROWE PRICE.
KEEPING AN EYE FOR ANTHROPIC'S S1, EARNINGS FROM PALO ALTO,
DELL, AND BROADCOM TO NAME A FEW. THE FIRST DAY OF THE APPLE'S
CEO IS TAKING PLACE AS WELL AND FRIDAY, MACRO IN FOCUS AND THE
FED, TOO, WITH THE U.S. MONTHLY JOBS REPORT.
THE SECOND PART OF THE FED'S DUAL MANDATE.
CATCH US ON MONDAY AT T. ROWE PRICE. ♪
Commentaires 0
Connectez-vous pour rejoindre la discussion.
Se connecterAucun commentaire pour l'instant. Soyez le premier à partager votre avis !