Recomendações
Entrada é o preço de fechamento do ativo na data de publicação. Atual é o último fechamento registrado.
-
Entrada $79.403,00 06 set 2026Atual $78.606,00 09 set 2026Resultado −$797,00vs. índice — BTC é o próprio índice de referência — não há excesso a medir
And that is why I tell you, buy Bitcoin. Buy Bitcoin.
Contexto extraído por IA "And that is why I tell you, buy Bitcoin. Buy Bitcoin. Hey."
Transcrição Completa
Hello, cryptomaniacs. I was supposed to release this video on Friday, but I needed to be inspired, I needed some divine light to help me convey this content to you, which I already recommend. Leave a like, leave a like because this one deserves it. If you don't like it by the end, you can remove the like. But go ahead and leave a like, it's guaranteed. Leave a like because we are much closer to 100,000 than you imagine. And I say this after a price drop in Bitcoin that happened due to immense job creation in the United States. The data shows three times more job creation than expected and that made Bitcoin fall. Does Bitcoin not like people being employed? Does Bitcoin want what's bad for you, does it want to see you unemployed? No, my friend, it's quite the opposite. And what I can say is that this is a sign, a very strong indicator that a lot of money will be printed and the government is worried about it. And when a lot of money is printed, when we have a flood of money into the market, what happens to Bitcoin? Ah, you know? I know, we all know and that's why we're here. So, hit that like button. And let's talk about this news first. U.S. job creation in August shatters estimates and gives the Fed room to raise rates. Just from the headline, you can see the problem isn't with Bitcoin. There is an actor interfering in the market. So we have job creation above expectations. But someone didn't like that. Fed raising interest rates. Why would the government or the Central Bank, in this case, raise interest rates if we have job creation? The problem here is that when people are employed, more people are earning money , it becomes harder to hide inflation. The government prints money continuously and it is very happy when that money is used to buy government bonds, buying U.S. debt, for example. This helps the government solve its problems. Now, when the poor get a job, they won't buy government debt, they will buy beans, a fridge, and a television. And all these market products and services will rise in price, making the real inflation clear to people. Then what does the government do? It raises interest rates , which makes money more expensive and makes it harder for people to buy goods and services, and then it levels things out. So we have market manipulation here; it’s not a free market. It’s a market constantly pushed up and down by the crazy ideas of some politician. Knowing this, the market anticipates. Well, since we had very positive jobs data, the chance of the Fed raising interest rates increases. So, it was below 45%and jumped to 53%right after the jobs data was released in the United States. And it is this rise, this expectation of an interest rate hike, that causes risk assets to lose value. After all, if they tighten the money supply, it inevitably impacts the purchasing of these assets. And we saw that happen immediately with Bitcoin right here. We are looking at a 1- minute chart, and you saw the price drop from 81,350. And in 3 minutes, it fell $ 600, entering the low 79s. This prevented the price from breaking through the green line, our 50-week simple moving average, which I told you is the resistance, right? Once we close a week above this green line, that’s it, it’s over. The price will skyrocket with or without you, but it won’t be this week. Thanks to this manipulation by the government and central banks, the price remains trapped between the two 50-week moving averages, right? The green is the simple and the yellow is the exponential. So it continues to move sideways within this tiny range between the two 50-week averages. But what I can tell you is that this is not the first time it has happened. This has happened in every cycle and precedes a massive price explosion for Bitcoin. This is linked to the business cycle, which I have talked about several times here on the channel, or industrial activity. When we have weak industrial activity, represented in this bottom chart by these green zones below zero, Bitcoin doesn't rise, as you can see during the green periods. But when industrial activity heats up and goes above the zero mark, shown in red on the bottom chart, what happens to Bitcoin above is the start of its bull run. This has already begun, as you can see here. This is the trigger to enter a bull cycle. And then I started questioning myself, right? Well, if industrial activity grows, what should we expect regarding jobs? Growth. If the industry is expanding, it needs to hire labor, so we will have more jobs. Exactly what came out. Triple the number of jobs created compared to what the government expected. And did the same happen in previous cycles when we had this expansion of industrial activity? I asked artificial intelligence this and asked if we had this same job growth at other times when industrial activity rose. The short answer is yes. Historically, whenever the business cycle, industrial activity crosses the zero line upward, the United States labor market usually validates this macroeconomic expansion with strong job growth. And then I asked another question. How long did it take for Bitcoin to reach the top after crossing the zero line? Approximately 1 year to 1 and a half years. Therefore, between 12 to 18 months a next peak happens. It is an extremely short period. We are not talking about you earning 20, 30%as in other investments. We are talking about you multiplying your wealth by three, four, five times in a period of one year to 1 and a half years. But, Guilherme, we are seeing Bitcoin retreating with the government potentially raising interest rates, aren't we? Yes, but this is a short-term impact that hides what the government is signaling. The government is signaling apprehension, fear of a major economic expansion, of growth in industrial activity and, therefore, an injection of money far beyond what they would like and that is out of the government's control. So, this here is a short-term impact, but what is coming ahead is a deluge. that cannot be controlled by the government. And I will use here the post from my friend JP. Follow him on Twitter, his handle is here, to show this to you. The subprime crisis cost 3.6 trillion in quantitative easing. So that means, 3.6 trillion dollars entered the market. Covid, the famous pandemic, cost 4.7 trillion in 2 years. Artificial intelligence already has 7.6 trillion in capex projected by 2031. 7.6 trillion in investment that must be realized by 2031. And this money has to come from somewhere, it can come from the government itself trying to incentivize the development of artificial intelligence, but a good part comes from the market itself. And here is the point. This is independent of the government's will. There will be heavy investment from the market in artificial intelligence. And all this money here that goes into this market, it stops going to debt repayment, to government bonds. And the government needs someone to pay the bill. If the market doesn't pay the bill, if the market doesn't buy these bonds, the government itself has to buy them, the government itself has to print money to pay that bill. So this printing happens one way or another. There will be a flood of money in the market greater than what we had during the pandemic. This is throughout what we project to be the bull market, the Bitcoin uptrend cycle, which goes until 2029, 2030, right? Since this capex is projected until 2031. So this is where this flood of money comes from. This is what worries the government. The same thing that happened in other cycles of industrial activity expansion. So the government manages to manipulate the market in the short term, preventing assets, for example, from breaking very obvious resistances like the one we are at now, right? Look here, we are testing a region that was support, that was resistance, and now it is being tested again as resistance around 80k. Breaking through this region takes the price directly to 100k. You can see that it's this point here, which was support back here, was resistance here, and will be tested again. So, an expansion happens quickly. If Bitcoin breaks, for example, this region now of 80k, closing above the 50-week moving average, it explodes to 100k very quickly. And if it breaks this region, it goes directly to the previous all-time high at 126k, because look, there is no resistance on the way. So this expansion is very accelerated. If the government doesn't control this here, not just for Bitcoin, but for stocks, for example, everything will rise in price very fast, exposing what the government does with our money. But you who don't have scarce assets are screwed, because in the past there was an advantage. This expansion of industrial activity was continuously accompanied by an expansion of employment and also wages. In other words, you earned part of this growth, part of it came back to you. But now these are new times. We are even talking about artificial intelligence generating this flow of money into the economy. But artificial intelligence doesn't need you, at least not like other sectors needed you in the past. For those who don't know, Tesla has just launched its driverless taxi, the Cybercab. You see it there in the image , right? Look at that, no pedal, no steering wheel, no driver. And the question is: well, what will happen to app drivers, to Uber drivers, when you don't need a driver who requires rest, a minimum wage, and a bunch of state regulatory rules? Oh, poor thing, the 6 -to-1 work schedule, you can't have that. Well, if you don't have a driver, you don't have those problems. What we are seeing over there is the CyberCab being cheaper than Uber, without you needing to deal with a driver. It's something much more interesting, much easier, it takes you where you want to go for a lower price. There are even some price spikes happening because everyone wants to take the CyberCab, it's a novelty, so everyone wants to test it. So yeah, it's competition, right? Supply and demand, right? An absurd demand, that makes the price go up, but when it normalizes, Tesla is even offering for people to buy several CyberCabs and put them on the market. When this stabilizes, it's simply over for app drivers. Tesla will make a lot of money, the owners of CyberCabs can make a lot of money, but the app drivers, the workers, the employees, in this case, won't. In fact, they will become unemployed. And it's not Tesla's fault, it's not the technology's fault, it's the State's fault. The State hates you. Understand this. This becomes evident from interest rate manipulation ; when you have a better life, you get a job, the state goes there and raises the interest rate to screw you over, to stop you from being able to buy things in the market, to get financing. So it is against you. And also when you get a job, you become an Uber driver, everything is going well, you have a legal condition, what does the state do ? It creates regulation, it creates barriers to entry in the market that make it more expensive for the company that hired you and also for you. This is happening even here in Portugal, it already happened in Brazil and now in Portugal. Look, the new TVDE law officially came into force in Portugal on September 1st, 2026, this week, bringing much stricter rules for drivers and platforms like Uber and Bolt. For example, where I live, most of the drivers are not Portuguese or Brazilian, they are Indian, they are from Bangladesh, so they don't speak fluent Portuguese. They generally speak English, which is not a problem because , oh, I would say 98%speak English here , right? So there's no problem. But here are the state's requirements for drivers now, look. Fluency in the Portuguese language. There's training for that. A more difficult exam. Now we have a minimum of 50 hours of classes, both theoretical and practical, and a final exam with 30 questions, and you have to get 90%of the answers correct. There is inspection and vehicle safety. This creates costs for the company and also for the driver. And there is integration with taxis and fares. So, fares have to be regulated. A total nightmare that makes it extremely difficult and expensive. Then a company comes along and says: "Here is the driverless CyberCab. If there's no driver, you don't need to speak Portuguese, you don't need to take little classes, you don't need a maximum number of work hours, you don't need minimum wage, and there, problem solved. Now the schedule is 0/7. You traded 6/1 for 0/7. They don't work any day of the week, but they don't get paid either. Now company stocks, look, Bitcoin, look, everything that is scarce will be bought because there will be more money in the market. This money doesn't reach those who are poorer, it reaches those at the top, business owners, and investors. And that's why I tell you, buy Bitcoin. Buy Bitcoin. You don't become independent, because your job goes to whatever is cheaper and more efficient. And in a market where the government creates so many absurd rules, of course artificial intelligence and technology will always be cheaper. You won't need employees at McDonald's to hand you the bag with your order. It will be a robot. You won't need a waiter to take your order. It will be a machine where you type what you want. And these people become totally dependent on the State to survive. That is the intention, because by becoming dependent on politicians, they vote for politicians. These welfare programs are vote-buying programs. This is so evident that you can verify it statistically. Just look it up. Articles come out about this. One just came out now. When is this article here that I'm looking at, look? June 18, 2026. This year Lula increases the size of Bolsa Família in an election year. Why did he, who was reducing Bolsa Família, decide to increase it in an election year? Because he gains votes by having more people linked to Bolsa Família. Then you, Bolsonaro supporter, are there, right? Lula is bad, Bolsonaro is good. No, no, no, no, no. Bolsonaro was even worse. Here it is. The biggest increase of all happened in Bolsonaro's election year, as you can see here. He was the one who increased the Bolsa Família welfare program the most in an election year. Lula does the exact same thing. Bolsonaro was even worse than Lula. So they all do this. Every politician does this. What they want is for you to be dependent on them. You there, saying:" Please, politician, give me a crumb of bread and I'll vote for you. "Oh, the state provides everything. We need more state, more state, more state. And that is what they achieve with those who don't prepare, who don't become independent from the system. And to become independent from the system, the only option we have, the only real private property, is called Bitcoin. And that is why it rises so absurdly when we have monetary expansion, a monetary inflation as strong as in these moments of industrial activity expansion. The State's role is to be a henchman, a security guard for an elite . The money they print is not for you. It is for the elite. The money enters from the top, through banks and large companies. They don't want it to trickle down to you, because what reaches you is inflation. And inflation costs the politician votes. They want this money dammed up at the top for as long as possible. And they will create as many barriers as necessary to protect that elite. I'll even close this video by talking about another form of protection for the elite. We had the terrible news that one of the oldest exchanges in Brazil, Coinex, which was one of the first to believe in my work, a sponsor of Cryptomaníacos back in the beginning, when it was all wild, is announcing its closure due to Central Bank rules. What rules are these? Minimum capital. So, for a company to operate in Brazil, a country with so few entrepreneurs, so few people in a position to own companies, they set a minimum capital. You have to have millions to own a company, and many small and medium-sized businesses close their doors. Who does this protect from competition? The big ones, those linked to politicians, who often even have politicians on their staff. These can obviously meet a minimum capital requirement of a few million, but innovation is not born in those dominating the market, in the big ones; it is born in the small ones. If it weren't that way, we wouldn't have Apple, we wouldn't have the iPhone. The iPhone was born in a garage. Steve Jobs and Wozniak locked in a garage. Two young men with no money, building computer circuits on their own. And if they needed minimum capital to do that, do you think they could enter the market? No, but Brazil imposes minimum capital on a market that depends on innovation, a tech market where young people want to be entrepreneurs, but can't because they lack the minimum capital. And that is how Brazil prevents competition, keeping the king's friends always on top. Don't wait for artificial intelligence to take your job. Become immune to the stupid decisions of governments. Buy Bitcoin. Hey.
Comentários 0
Entre para participar da discussão.
EntrarAinda não há comentários. Seja o primeiro a compartilhar sua opinião!