BUY ALERT: This $12 Stock Has MASSIVE Potential

Folks, a few days ago, President Trump signed a national security policy on space. In it, he called for 1,000 launches per year by 2030. Now, this is going to be a massive tailwind for a lot of space companies. And one specific one I believe is going to benefit quite a lot, and it also happens to be down about 50 some odd percent. But just so you understand, 1,000 space launches a year is about a five-fold increase to what we're currently doing. And there's going to be quite the shite storm of capital flowing everywhere to fulfill this policy. And if you followed many of Trump's orders over the past couple of years, well, you know that they can frequently cause massive tailwinds to the stocks that are directly in line of said order. They can cause quite beautiful rally rallitos, which is what we really like here. So, in today's video, we're going to cover five things for you. Number one, what the order actually says. Number two, why 1,000 launches a year is a massive tailwind for specific space companies. I mean, there's so much money that has to go into making this happen. Number three, where the money is actually coming from. This is a very important part. Number four, the stocks. The stocks that are benefiting layer by layer from the companies that own rockets down to the companies that sell you what you see from orbit. Number five, the specific dates over the next eight months that you need to write down and be aware of because these are the catalyst dates. And then lastly, we're going to go on to our sponsored segment on EVA Live, ticker symbol GO AI on the NASDAQ. Evil Live writes the software that decides which ad gets shown to which person, then keeps changing that decision while the campaign is still running. The company has done that for Fortune 100 advertisers and it reports that the platform handles 100 million display impressions a day across 192 countries. That engine is now the foundation for an additional three businesses. I'll break down the company and why you may want to put it on your radar. And as always, if you're the one taking the ultimate risk, you better be the one doing the ultimate frisk. Always do your own due diligence on all ideas presented. Or as they say here, leisky leisy. Okay, first I want you to understand what this document is that the president signed. It's called NSPM17. It replaces the National Space Transportation Policy. And this is quite a big deal. You see, this policy was last updated back in 2013. That's when the Breaking Bad finale came out. And boy was that a good finale. But that was a long damn time ago. And in 2013, the US conducted 19 orbital launches. In 2025, it did 178. Now, what does it direct? Well, for starters, new launch sites. The Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of the Interior have to identify additional launch and re-entry locations. That includes federally owned land. Federal lands for an additional re-entry site have to be identified within 90 days of this order. Then you have faster permitting. Agencies are told to expedite permitting and environmental reviews. This follows an FAA proposed rulemaking in July that would wave environmental reviews for launch infrastructure. Now, this administration has been waving pretty much anything in regards to the environment except for windmills because I guess they're bad for the birds. But pretty much you want to do anything with the environment, the administration doesn't care. They're going to approve you. From a space industry standpoint, this is a big big windfall. And then you have priority airspace. Launch corridors get designated priority airspace. Space traffic gets folded into air traffic control modernization. This is a very big deal. The industry has been begging for this for a long time. And then you have published range schedules. Agencies have 180 days to develop range scheduling criteria and they have to publish the schedules. Right now, range time is the bottleneck nobody outside of the industry talks about, but it's a big deal in terms of the bottom line. And then you have private co-development agencies are told to incentivize co-development of infrastructure with private partners, including leases and public private partnerships on federal property. And the government commits to staying out of activities that compete with private launch providers except where public safety or national security requires it. And then you have by America on launch. Government payloads have to fly on vehicles manufactured in the US. And then you have multiple providers. So agencies have to maintain more than one route to orbit for every key orbital regime and payload class. This is anti- concentration, anti- monopoly language, and this is a really big deal for a lot of the smaller companies that have a shot now to win big old contracts. And we love small companies winning big old contracts because it's very juicy. And then you have moon and Mars. So NASA is directed to build a lunar logistics architecture for commercial transport to and from the surface. explore commercial robotic access to Mars and explore commercial architectures for sending humans to Mars. And then you have the Pentagon. So the Secretary of Defense, I mean, I guess that's now the Secretary of War, is told to pursue in space transportation services, including onorbit servicing and inspace logistics. All stuff that's incredibly expensive and while pie in the sky means lots of money coming in now to develop this long term. Now, with every order that comes out of the administration, you have to understand there's kind of like the fluffy nothing ever is going to happen part of the order, which is mostly symbolic. And then you have the other part of the order, which is actual massive government intervention to subsidize, prop up, and otherwise accelerate a field of companies towards whatever domestic goal it is, whether it's rare earths, chips, or in this case, space. Now, let's put that into a timeline. So, August 2025, executive order comes out enabling competition in commercial space. This was a big one that really opened up the market. December 2025, executive order 14369 ensuring American space superiority, moonlanding target of 2028, lunar outpost by 2030, and nuclear power systems in space. And then April 2026, you have the Artemis 2 that carried astronauts to lunar orbit for the first time in over 50 years. And then July 2026, you had the FAA moving to strip environmental review requirements. And then 2026, you have this memorandum. Now, if you look at it like this, we have a timeline of consistent massive governmental tailwinds for the space sector and really deregulation for the space sector. Each of these points removed a massive friction point that the industry has been complaining about for years. Now, that said, like most things that the government cares about, one of the most important parts of this to understand is the defense part. Nothing sells the US government more than defense. 10 years ago, if you're looking at space stocks, the issue was you were thinking about rockets, the moon, Mars, Elon Musk's big promises. However, that was 10 years ago. Now, it's a completely different story. Start with the document we just went through. It is a national security presidential memorandum. It's not some executive order on commerce. It is addressed to the secretary of war, the director of national intelligence, and the national security adviser. Even Buzz Lightyear got this memorandum. It was signed under National Security Authority. The way that the White House framed this was very explicit. It said that adversaries are challenging American space superiority and protecting orbital assets is described as essential to military readiness. So, let's go back a few more years. So, Trump goes and creates the Space Force in 2019, first new branch of armed forces in more than 70 years. And today, the Space Force has roughly 26 billion in fiscal 2026 appropriations at about 13.8 billion counted from the 2025 reconciliation package and planned resources approach around $40 billion. That's about double its funding from 5 years ago. And the fiscal 2027 request proposed is taking it to $71 billion. Just so you understand how much money that is, that would put a service that did not exist eight years ago on a budget comparable to the entire national defense budgets abroad. Now, the numbers are the numbers. And maybe it's hard to kind of feel what this means, but let's talk about what the actual demand is here, why the government cares, what specifically is going on. So, the old way the military did space was a handful of extraordinary, expensive satellites parked in high orbit. Those are called exquisite systems, and they are exquisitly expensive. Each one cost over a billion dollars, took a decade to build, and was expected to last 20 years. That model, though, has one fatal problem, and it's pretty damn serious. If there's four exquisite satellites out there in orbit protecting the country, well, if an adversary decides to just destroy those four satellites, all of a sudden, the country's blindsided. And of course, China and Russia have developed systems to do exactly that. So, the Pentagon had to change the architecture. Instead of a few enormous satellites in high orbit, it now buys hundreds of cheaper satellites in low Earth orbit. The logic here is, look, it's easy to shoot down four satellites, it's a lot harder to shoot down 400 satellites. Think about what that change requires. It requires satellites to be mass- prodduced on schedule and at a affordable price. It requires launch capacity to put hundreds of them up and to keep replacing them. And it requires a supplier base that can actually manufacture at volume. None of the official defense contractors do this. Lockheed and Northre are really good at building just one satellite for an extremely expensive price that does an excellent job, but it's just one satellite. However, if you want to build hundreds of small ones, not so good. That gap is the entire reason why the commercial space has been ballooning over the past couple of years. Okay, but Charlie, what is the biggest expression of this? Where are we actually seeing this being implemented? Well, the Golden Dome is one of the biggest examples. President Trump, as you've probably heard, is a very big proponent and fan of the Golden Dome. And I'm not talking about the one at Trump Tower, although that's also a national security priority. But really, what this golden dome is is it's a layered missile defense shield meant to protect the homeland from ballistic and hypersonic threats. And a big piece of it lives in the orbit. The space force awarded 20 contracts worth up to a combined 3.2 billion to 12 companies to build space-based interceptor prototypes. That list includes companies like Anderall, Boost, Allen, General Dynamics, Lockheed Northre Raon Scitec SpaceX True Anomaly, and Trion Space. And unlike the groundbased interceptors, these put defense weapons directly in orbit. So a missile can be engaged during the boost phase rather than on its way down, which makes a big difference. Okay, I can keep going on and on with this and how all of this stuff is being deployed. But the most important part is where's the money going, right? We're investors, we're traders, we're market speculators and we're Barry Berrito haters. Okay, so that leads us next to the stocks. And before we even get into those stocks, I want you to keep in mind the cycle these are all on. So when it comes down to institutional money, Wall Street, the big money, the thought process pre2026 was that space stocks are bad. They're unprofitable. They're too pie in the sky literally metaphorically symbolically. But then in early 2026, everything changed. Space stocks are great because SpaceX is going to IPO and there's hype riding and there's Artemis 2 and all of a sudden there's a bunch of defense reasons to buy. And then after the SpaceX IPO, all of a sudden it switched. Space stocks are bad because hype is gone. bond yields are up and long-term dilution fears, which we'll cover later. But today, you're starting to see a flip. And the flip is that space stocks are down, but they're slowly building back as they prove themselves. And so, this is the situation that we're in today. We're past the hype and dump phase, and we're heading into the longer term price discovery and the longer term value creation. And if you go back to our SpaceX stock videos from a couple of months ago before the SpaceX IPO, this is what we said was going to happen. We said you're going to see a massive runup into the SpaceX IPO of a lot of the smaller companies and then you're going to see a big taking profit period and then all of a sudden after that you're going to see the opportunity to buy for the long term. So what are the stocks? Well, of course we have to start with SpaceX. So SpaceX does three separate things. It builds and flies reusable rockets. Falcon 9 does the heavy lifting today. Starship is the next generation vehicle still in testing. It runs Starlink which beams internet down from satellites in low Earth orbit. If you live somewhere a cable company will not go, well, Starlink is your internet and it's beautiful on flights, by the way. And it owns the AI business, which includes XAI, the Xplatform, and cloud computed out to other companies, which is increasingly becoming a beautiful and big business. Now, SpaceX is a clear winner from this memorandum. SpaceX has completed 100 launches so far in 2026. After 170 last year, its fastest turnaround between two missions this month was 38 minutes and 31 seconds. Second quarter revenue was 7.8 81 billion and all three segments beat. Starlink did 4.3 billion of that up 66% with 1.66 billion and operating profit and 12 million subscribertos. Next you have Rocket Lab. So Rocket Lab is the number two American launch company and it is deliberately not trying to be SpaceX. Small rocket, small payloads, high frequency. If you have one satellite and you want it in a specific orbit on a specific date, well SpaceX is going to make you wait for a ride share. But Rocket Lab is going to fly you dedicated. So, if you want to get on the bus with a bunch of other players and you want to wait for that, that's great. But if you want one specific Uber right to you, so to speak, well, Rocket Lab is the one to go to. But launch is only part of it. Rocket Lab also builds satellites and components for other people. A lot of its revenue comes from being a supplier to the industry rather than a rocket operator. It also runs what's called Haste, a suborbital electron used to test hypersonic technology, which is a pure defense product and very beautiful, too. Now, second quarter revenue was a record 234 million, up 62%. backlog hit 2.36 billion up 137%. Then you have Aridium. Rocket Lab is buying the satellite operator for $8 billion. It's closed in somewhere in mid 2027. Aridium brings roughly 870 million of recurring annual revenue against Rocket Lab's own 936 million run rate. Next, you have Firefly Aerospace, ticker symbol F Ly. Firefly is the third launch name and arguably the third biggest benefactor of this memorandum and it is the lunar delivery specialist. Alpha is its small lift rocket. Blue Ghost is its robotic moon lander flying under NASA's program that pays private companies to deliver cargo to the lunar surface. And the near-term catalyst for this guy is Blue Ghost mission 2 targeting the first American landing on the far side of the moon. Okay, next layer two, the direct device player. So the first one you got to know is Space Mobile AS is building a cell tower network in space. That is the whole pitch, not a satellite phone, not a special device, an ordinary smartphone in your pocket connecting to a satellite overhead when there is no tower nearby. This company isn't selling direct to consumers. It sells wholesale to carriers who resell the coverage to their own subscribers. More than more than 60 mobile network operators are signed up, covering over three billion subscribers. Second quarter revenue was 31.5 million, more than double the first quarter. So this is growing massively. Backlog sits at roughly 1.3 billion. The constellation is the main story here though you want to pay attention to. Manufacturing is scaling towards six satellites per month at at 21 to 23 million each, targeting 45 in orbit by early 2027. Now the government angle is one that matters a lot more than people expect. A network that reaches an ordinary handset anywhere on Earth is obviously useful and really essential to a soldier. Layer three, inspace infrastructure. These are the players that build the things that operate once they get up there into the intergalactic areas. First, you have intuitive machines, LUNR. This company lands robotic spacecraft on the moon on contract to NASA. That used to be something only national space programs did. But the market is growing because NASA has outlined more than 20 robotic landings through 2029 to build infrastructure near the lunar south pole before astronauts even arrive. It is also pushing into defense with an $800 million acquisition of Lentteras Space Systems that CEO Steve Alimus framed as positioning the company as a next generation space prime. And then we have the company that I actually referenced in the main video today, Red Wire, which I'm a big fan of and we talked about even at lower prices than today. Although the company did go all the way up and then went most of the way back down. However, this is one that I'm very, very bullish on. Redwire makes the parts that go on other people's spacecrafts. Solar arrays, deployable structures, inspace manufacturing hardware, essential stuff. Buzz Lightyear and Wall-E both love this company. If a satellite needs power or needs to unfold something once it reaches orbit, there is a decent chance Red Wire built that piece. So it is a supplier to the whole buildout rather than a bet on any single mission. Latest reported earnings was great proof of concept. I love this company right now. Voyager Technologies is the next one. VG. The station work targets what comes after the International Space Station which is scheduled to be retired. Somebody has to own commercial habitats in orbit after that and they reported record revenue of 52.7 million and 336 million of backlog with guidance raised on record bookings. Okay. Then we got to go into layer four which is components. This is the picks and shovels layer. It does not matter whose rocket wins. Carmen Space and Defense KRMN going to be winning because they make the hardware that holds the whole rocket together. Payload fairings, which are the nose cones that protect the satellite on the way up. Interstage systems, which connect one rocket stage to the next, and propulsion components. It sells that same hardware into two markets. Space launch and missiles. Both budget lines are going up at the same time, which is the entire investment case for this company. Its revenue tracks total launch volume. And so when you consider that launches are supposed to go up five-fold, well, this company is one of the most obvious benefactors here. It also has the cleanest financial picture in the group. Second quarter revenue was a record $182.1 million, up 58%. Net income was a record $14 million, up 106%. Backlog hit 1.3 billion. And the company's actually profitable, which separates it from most of the sector. Now, layer four, the Earth observation layer. This one's actually quite interesting because a lot of these companies really haven't gotten a lot of hype. Planet Labs, PL, Black Sky, BKSY, and Spire Global, Spir operate imaging and sensing constellations and sell the data downstream. Customers are governments, insurers agriculture defense and intelligence. The model is subscription rather than hardware, so it monetizes off the constellation buildout instead of participating in it, which I think is a really good diversification tactic. And then you have the primes, Loheed Martin, Northw Grin, and L3 Harris all holden Dome work. They're key suppliers in the Golden Dome. I think these are slow movers. I think these are great long-term quality companies, but slow mover is not the most exciting in the space. I don't think they're going to move the needle too much. Probably will underperform the S&P. Now, the next thing we have to talk about are the two things that can really hurt these space valuations. The real risk factors. We already talked about contracts backlog, the the order from Trump. We talked about all these things. Those were the demand side of the equation. Great. There's lots of demand coming. But the risk factors, the draw down factors for these stocks are really are really rates and dilution. All of these companies have earnings far out in the future. So if the interest rates, the bond yields start going up and up, which they just hit a new high this past week. If rates keep climbing, well, far off earnings and far-off sales become less and less valuable. And while members of the administration have tried to douse that fire, hasn't really worked so far. In fact, President Trump has even suggested using military intervention in the bond market, which hey, I mean, it is pretty violent. I think it might be time to do that. I watched the clip. I'm not 100% sure what he was referring to, but it sure did sound like that's what he said. But then there's also dilution and this is really the big long-term concern. So how am I thinking about this? Well, I think that defense inflows are actually the biggest hedge against this problem. The more money and foreign visibility that these companies have because of defense spending and because of the overall buildout related to that, well, the less they're going to need to raise money and the more that when they do raise money, you're actually going to see return on whatever share increase they do. Most of these companies raised at the top of the market before before the SpaceX IPO got really good prices for their equity raises and now are well capitalized and have big backlogs behind them. The fact of the matter is that in the vast majority of the cases, these stocks are down. They're down huge and it doesn't make a lot of sense to raise money when your stock is down huge. Especially when you already have a very builtout balance sheet, massive backlogs, a lot of government a lot of government tailwinds and so on and so forth. bigger picture when it comes down to the best base stocks and the ones that have great execution. I think the negatives from rates and dilution are going to be outpaced by the positives of this opportunity. I think in some cases that's going to be a very wrong statement, which is probably why you don't want to concentrate in just one or two of these names. You either want to buy an ETF or you want to buy maybe four or five of your favorites. You could do whatever you want. I'm just presenting my research, but that's my take on it. Let's get on to the catalyst. So, what to watch? Well, around November 18th, Interior identifies the Department of Interior is going to identify federal land for an additional re-entry site. This is the first test and the easiest one to meet. Around December 18th, state and commerce update export controls with watch this one if you own component makers. I think this is a very, very key update we're going to get. And then around February 16th, this is the heavy date range scheduling criteria, the new site report, the airspace plan, and the industrialbased strategy will be revealed. And then around April 17th, Commerce delivers a development plan for the rantry site. These are very key events to watch for the overall culmination of this presidential memorandum. Okay, now it's time to go on to our sponsored segment. And today's sponsored segment is on EVA Live, ticker symbol GO AI, on the NASDAQ. This company writes AI software once and sells it into four industries at the same time. So EVA began as an AI marketing platform. Founder and CEO David Bollette took the company public in October of 2021 and his stated goal was removing human error, lag, and fraud from digital media buying, an industry that the company sizes at 333 billion. Before the public listing, EVO was already serving Fortune 100 clients and running 100 million display impressions a day across 192 countries. Now, here's the problem of business solves. You see, when somebody loads a page, something has to decide which ad appears, whether that person is worth bidding on, and what to pay before the page finishes loading. Traditionally, a campaign manager sets those rules up front. Then, they wait. They read a report a day or two later, adjust bids by hand, shift budget towards whatever worked, and pause whatever they did. By the time the adjustment goes live, the conditions that produce the data have already moved. Every hour of that lag cost the advertiser money. Eva's answer is Neuroserver, which the company calls the first AI ad server with proprietary learning built in. Neuroserver takes over the decisions a human used to make between reports. It analyzes signals as they arrive, prices each bid on its own, shifts budget toward the strong performers, pauses weak ads before they burn more money, and tests creative variation so improvements land fast. It runs across all the major channels, and activates both first party and third party data. Eva says the platform powers more than 10,000 campaigns at once and the structure above it explains where that money goes. Eva Live is organized in three layers. The parent company sits on top. It owns subsidiaries, allocates capital, sets governance and security standards and holds access to public markets. The middle layer is EVA XAI. The shared code base engineered in one place and under constant development. The bottom layer is the four marketfacing companies each with its own leadership and its own mandate. EVA describes itself as an operating parent rather than a portfolio. And that distinction is the whole pitch here. A holding company owns unrelated assets. EVA owns four businesses run in the same engine, which means engineering done once gets used four times. Capital moves down and data moves back up. The parent puts growth equity into subsidiaries against return thresholds. How durable the advantage looks in each market and how capital intensive that market is. Eva says it reinvests behind proven performance and pulls capital out of anything that misses those thresholds. Funding comes from access to public markets plus reinvested operating cash flow. Now, let's talk about the defense build. The newest piece and the one generating the most headlines. Eva Defense is wholly owned and it is building three products. The GOAT aircraft is a compact autonomous drone with sensors forward and a proprietary acoustic profile, meaning it is engineered around how it sounds to anyone listening for it. Form OS is the console a single operator works from with a mission planner that takes in live alerts, weather, and payload data and coordinates multiple aircraft through one tap actions. MM Wavelink is the communications layer built to hold a connection through jamming. The problem it addresses is called DDIL. Denied, degraded, intermediate, and limited. Satellite navigation drops out. GPS gets denied. Radio links get jammed or squeezed down to almost nothing. A drone that loses its command link in those conditions stops being useful at the exact moment it matters. Now, three things happened over the past month. On July 20th, EVA signed a letter of intent to acquire controlling 51% interest in Airbeam wireless technologies with an option on the rest. Arab build 60 gigahertz connectivity for next generation wireless networks and its portfolio acquired from Lati Semiconductor carries access to more than 260 patents with lineage running back two decades through Berkeley's wireless research center CBA beam and silicon image. A conventional radio sends its signal everywhere which makes it easy to find and easy to jam but millimeter wavelengths are narrow and aimed so pointing one's aircraft beam at another gives you a secure high bandwidth connection inside a mesh. On August 3rd, EVA formed an EVA defense advisory board with two members, General Robert Brooks Brown, US Army retired, who held numerous senior command positions and Ross Mandela, a data privacy and cyber security adviser at Square Patent Bogs. Both take a hands-on approach in product requirements and testing priorities. August 6, EVA Defense signed a development agreement with Boomerang, which builds hydrogen-powered unmanned air and maritime systems out of Irvine and Austin. The program runs 12 months through July 2027 and moves through stage gates. feasibility, proof of concept, field test, and beta. The target is a sub55 pound aircraft that keeps flying and keeps transmitting while GPS and radio are degraded. Stated deliverables are 10 to 20 field tested prototypes and a low rate production plan. Keep in mind though that states this program still has no customer, no contract reward, and no program of record. Remaining two subsidiaries sit further back. Eva Health targets diagnosis and care delivery and in June 2026, the company raised its stake in Spiro Senior Living to 51%. In terms of the leadership, David Bollet is the founder, CEO, and chairman with more than 20 years in software development. Imran Furos is CFO with two decades in corporate finance, risk management, and capital market strategy and has held the certified financial risk manager designation since 2003. Jan Sheir Kazali runs corporate finance compliant and investor relations. Ryan Bartlett heads product and user experience. And Robert Vasco leads software engineering. On the board, Phil Aspen built the relationship division at NASDAQ listed value click. Ryzen Jamal is president of Clarity Mortgage. Terry Fields is a corporate and securities lawyer with more than 45 years across public companies and Alicia admin advises on global digital transformation in governments. Now let's talk about some of the risks. So Evolive is a micro cap company. Micro caps move hard in both directions and a good portion of the story is still a plan rather than an actual track record. It's extremely expensive to build out a new company and to run these subsidiaries and that means that ongoing dilution is all but a guarantee. So, these are all things to keep in mind when you're doing your own research. As with any small cap company, you got to be aware that these things can move very aggressively. And the vast majority of small cap companies do ultimately end up failing. So, but anyways, in conclusion, Evil Live runs an AI ad platform with Fortune 100 clients, published campaign results, and a product line covering the buy, the fraud screen, and the conversion. Above it sits a shared code base. The company's now aiming at three more industries with defense the furthest along, three products in development, two senior advisor shaping requirements, a chip deal pending, and a funded drone program running through July 2027. Anyways, take a look at Evil Lives investor relations page down below. As always, this is not financial advice. Make sure to do all of your own due diligence and homework and have a great rest of your